From: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>, Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <isolodrai@meta.com>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add Spectre v4 tests
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:50:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250628145016.784256-4-luis.gerhorst@fau.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250628145016.784256-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Add the following tests:
1. A test with an (unimportant) ldimm64 (16 byte insn) and a
Spectre-v4--induced nospec that clarifies and serves as a basic
Spectre v4 test.
2. Make sure a Spectre v4 nospec_result does not prevent a Spectre v1
nospec from being added before the dangerous instruction (tests that
[1] is fixed).
3. Combine the two, which is the combination that triggers the warning
in [2]. This is because the unanalyzed stack write has nospec_result
set, but the ldimm64 (which was just analyzed) had incremented
insn_idx by 2. That violates the assertion that nospec_result is only
used after insns that increment insn_idx by 1 (i.e., stack writes).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4266fd5de04092aa4971cbef14f1b4b96961f432.camel@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/685b3c1b.050a0220.2303ee.0010.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 4 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index a678463e972c..be7d9bfa8390 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -235,4 +235,8 @@
#define SPEC_V1
#endif
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+#define SPEC_V4
+#endif
+
#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c
index 4470541b5e71..28b4f7035ceb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c
@@ -801,4 +801,153 @@ l2_%=: \
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("socket")
+__description("unpriv: ldimm64 before Spectre v4 barrier")
+__success __success_unpriv
+__retval(0)
+#ifdef SPEC_V4
+__xlated_unpriv("r1 = 0x2020200005642020") /* should not matter */
+__xlated_unpriv("*(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec")
+#endif
+__naked void unpriv_ldimm64_spectre_v4(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0x2020200005642020 ll; \
+ *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" ::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("unpriv: Spectre v1 and v4 barrier")
+__success __success_unpriv
+__retval(0)
+#ifdef SPEC_V1
+#ifdef SPEC_V4
+/* starts with r0 == r8 == r9 == 0 */
+__xlated_unpriv("if r8 != 0x0 goto pc+1")
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc+2")
+__xlated_unpriv("if r9 == 0x0 goto pc+4")
+__xlated_unpriv("r2 = r0")
+/* Following nospec required to prevent following dangerous `*(u64 *)(NOT_FP -64)
+ * = r1` iff `if r9 == 0 goto pc+4` was mispredicted because of Spectre v1. The
+ * test therefore ensures the Spectre-v4--induced nospec does not prevent the
+ * Spectre-v1--induced speculative path from being fully analyzed.
+ */
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec") /* Spectre v1 */
+__xlated_unpriv("*(u64 *)(r2 -64) = r1") /* could be used to leak r2 */
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec") /* Spectre v4 */
+#endif
+#endif
+__naked void unpriv_spectre_v1_and_v4(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_8b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ r8 = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_8b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ r9 = r0; \
+ r0 = r10; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ if r8 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ if r9 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+l0_%=: if r8 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ goto l2_%=; \
+l1_%=: if r9 == 0 goto l3_%=; \
+ r2 = r0; \
+l2_%=: *(u64 *)(r2 -64) = r1; \
+l3_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_8b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("unpriv: Spectre v1 and v4 barrier (simple)")
+__success __success_unpriv
+__retval(0)
+#ifdef SPEC_V1
+#ifdef SPEC_V4
+__xlated_unpriv("if r8 != 0x0 goto pc+1")
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc+2")
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc-1") /* if r9 == 0 goto l3_%= */
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc-1") /* r2 = r0 */
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec")
+__xlated_unpriv("*(u64 *)(r2 -64) = r1")
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec")
+#endif
+#endif
+__naked void unpriv_spectre_v1_and_v4_simple(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r8 = 0; \
+ r9 = 0; \
+ r0 = r10; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ if r8 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ if r9 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+l0_%=: if r8 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ goto l2_%=; \
+l1_%=: if r9 == 0 goto l3_%=; \
+ r2 = r0; \
+l2_%=: *(u64 *)(r2 -64) = r1; \
+l3_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" ::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("unpriv: ldimm64 before Spectre v1 and v4 barrier (simple)")
+__success __success_unpriv
+__retval(0)
+#ifdef SPEC_V1
+#ifdef SPEC_V4
+__xlated_unpriv("if r8 != 0x0 goto pc+1")
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc+4")
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc-1") /* if r9 == 0 goto l3_%= */
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc-1") /* r2 = r0 */
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc-1") /* r1 = 0x2020200005642020 ll */
+__xlated_unpriv("goto pc-1") /* second part of ldimm64 */
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec")
+__xlated_unpriv("*(u64 *)(r2 -64) = r1")
+__xlated_unpriv("nospec")
+#endif
+#endif
+__naked void unpriv_ldimm64_spectre_v1_and_v4_simple(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r8 = 0; \
+ r9 = 0; \
+ r0 = r10; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ if r8 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ if r9 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+l0_%=: if r8 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ goto l2_%=; \
+l1_%=: if r9 == 0 goto l3_%=; \
+ r2 = r0; \
+ r1 = 0x2020200005642020 ll; \
+l2_%=: *(u64 *)(r2 -64) = r1; \
+l3_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" ::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.49.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-28 14:50 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Fix and test aux usage after do_check_insn() Luis Gerhorst
2025-06-28 14:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Update env->prev_insn_idx " Luis Gerhorst
2025-06-28 14:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: Fix aux usage " Luis Gerhorst
2025-06-30 1:05 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-02 8:56 ` Luis Gerhorst
2025-06-28 14:50 ` Luis Gerhorst [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250628145016.784256-4-luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--to=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=isolodrai@meta.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mrpre@163.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®