From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: folio_pte_batch() improvements
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:49:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702104926.212243-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Ever since we added folio_pte_batch() for fork() + munmap() purposes,
a lot more users appeared (and more are being proposed), and more
functionality was added.
Most of the users only need basic functionality, and could benefit from
a non-inlined version.
So let's clean up folio_pte_batch() and split it into a basic
folio_pte_batch() (no flags) and a more advanced folio_pte_batch_ext().
Using either variant will now look much cleaner.
This series will likely conflict with some changes in some
(old+new) folio_pte_batch() users, but conflicts should be trivial to
resolve.
Tested on x86-64. Cross-compile tested.
v1 -> v2:
* Use FPB_RESPECT_* instead of FPB_HONOR_*
* Use folio_pte_batch_flags() instead of folio_pte_batch_ext()
* Improvements to patch descriptions + comments/doc
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
David Hildenbrand (4):
mm: convert FPB_IGNORE_* into FPB_RESPECT_*
mm: smaller folio_pte_batch() improvements
mm: split folio_pte_batch() into folio_pte_batch() and
folio_pte_batch_flags()
mm: remove boolean output parameters from folio_pte_batch_ext()
mm/internal.h | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
mm/madvise.c | 27 +++---------
mm/memory.c | 21 +++------
mm/mempolicy.c | 5 +--
mm/mlock.c | 4 +-
mm/mremap.c | 4 +-
mm/rmap.c | 4 +-
mm/util.c | 29 ++++++++++++
8 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
base-commit: 01136079697c6686e7198bf1797c004767ecf6f1
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 10:49 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-07-02 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: convert FPB_IGNORE_* into FPB_RESPECT_* David Hildenbrand
2025-07-03 10:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: smaller folio_pte_batch() improvements David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 14:24 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03 10:18 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: split folio_pte_batch() into folio_pte_batch() and folio_pte_batch_flags() David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 14:25 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-03 10:45 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: remove boolean output parameters from folio_pte_batch_ext() David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 14:00 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-02 14:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 17:53 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-03 9:16 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-03 12:56 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-04 8:22 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-04 8:23 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702104926.212243-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®