From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3942C23ED5B; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 21:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751492499; cv=none; b=V+Bv6DFfOO8nl6Z0M+nEt33IEnLByFOyoVWrdp746KgvUZkhWvjgADN41R63FxA3HQinRPBQtK0JHNx6cFxutnkBAFoE++1WlmR7IDs0+7eDY+YG9E78ufnlZ+Pf9glanseukyXcXFJsTOSOnMrY5oaTmyM7TedhYgxkRFweunk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751492499; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UoHy6Aahnj3DqsTAIhcEdtokW/qWpOyjEzESnt8Bfz8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OKRT4qcseKUW324q4UpUqIA0wn4PE2Z46l+8+4EztUJfH8sCDwK5nWyAkN7+U6U6BqIIuKneFJz+NuUm7jHK+YBv0/+8HCX11B1uD2ZvNLl04uXC4jQ/gCQqpTqtQTihxw04VWc/cU0SoP4mljw4AngwU/+D/d4yY5FKJbujqeU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZcpU3sTP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZcpU3sTP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A4A2C4CEE7; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 21:41:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751492497; bh=UoHy6Aahnj3DqsTAIhcEdtokW/qWpOyjEzESnt8Bfz8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZcpU3sTPyl05mGn/7w01cXw+NulGVZDapb5sDP6q5Kt1HXOM4d0/JEn9s7VW985wg dwE1IwYwaKV+cKw2+H69RJEBHfIv+yfLv8SHcVKGTvb+LigXcDxhpZLIUrU3Qxp3AN fV4Z6QmHI+tyAB+4pzkkpJB8qTlwmcwHqkGGEfcGXhbQYYKrJSNLssxX8+ghKxALc0 lue2ZH/MMvP1uNxY9qCkiWdhtwV4gLi24P87xxs3CUfFpyTq2cx7VfAgmycngpMoFz cceXbuyW/l1FHKTdQvkmJ4lpD8yV1E9AZ6j6qi13XPRW84wyJJ7ffDLjyFV/2fwaIX dn/uhzOk6irxA== Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 14:41:33 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Andrii Nakryiko , Quentin Monnet , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Willy Tarreau , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] tools/build: Fix s390(x) cross-compilation with clang Message-ID: <20250702214133.GB2103156@ax162> References: <20250620-tools-cross-s390-v2-0-ecda886e00e5@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250620-tools-cross-s390-v2-0-ecda886e00e5@linutronix.de> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:00:26PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > The heuristic to derive a clang target triple from a GCC one does not work > for s390. GCC uses "s390-linux" while clang expects "s390x-linux" or > "powerz-linux". This generally seems fine to me but I do not interact with tools/ much. > There doesn't seem to be a formal maintainer for this file. > Maybe the clang/llvm maintainers can pick it up. I do not have a tree nor do I send pull requests to Linus. Perhaps you could just pick this up in the nolibc tree or have Shuah take it as a greater kselftests update? Cheers, Nathan