Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: eeprom: Add ST M24LR support

[Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 17:10:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2025 14:39, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi wrote:
> > Add support for STMicroelectronics M24LR RFID/NFC EEPROM chips.
> > These devices use two I2C addresses: the primary address provides
> > access to control and system parameter registers, while the
> > secondary address is used for EEPROM access.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v5:
> >  - No changes and already reviewed by Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >  - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250608182714.3359441-2-abd.masalkhi@gmail.com/
> 
> So you just ignore the tag?
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
> tags received on the version they apply.
> 
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>

Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for the clear explanation. I wasn't aware of the process,
I will make sure to include the tags properly in future versions.

Best regards,
Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi