[PATCH] ocfs2: avoid potential ABBA deadlock by reordering tl_inode lock

[Ivan Pravdin <ipravdin.official@gmail.com>]

In ocfs2_move_extent(), tl_inode is currently locked after the global
bitmap inode. However, in ocfs2_flush_truncate_log(), the lock order
is reversed: tl_inode is locked first, followed by the global bitmap
inode.

This creates a classic ABBA deadlock scenario if two threads attempt
these operations concurrently and acquire the locks in different orders.

To prevent this, move the tl_inode locking earlier in
ocfs2_move_extent(), so that it always precedes the global bitmap
inode lock.

No functional changes beyond lock ordering.

Reported-by: syzbot+6bf948e47f9bac7aacfa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67d5645c.050a0220.1dc86f.0004.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Ivan Pravdin <ipravdin.official@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
index 369c7d27befd..ab460cb2c9c8 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
@@ -617,6 +617,8 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extent(struct ocfs2_move_extents_context *context,
 	 */
 	credits += OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS + 1;
 
+	inode_lock(tl_inode);
+
 	/*
 	 * ocfs2_move_extent() didn't reserve any clusters in lock_allocators()
 	 * logic, while we still need to lock the global_bitmap.
@@ -637,8 +639,6 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extent(struct ocfs2_move_extents_context *context,
 		goto out_unlock_gb_mutex;
 	}
 
-	inode_lock(tl_inode);
-
 	handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits);
 	if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
-- 
2.45.2