From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>," Thomas Gleixner
"<tglx@linutronix.de>," Ingo Molnar "<mingo@redhat.com>,"
Borislav Petkov "<bp@alien8.de>," Dave Hansen
"<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,<x86@kernel.org>," H . Peter
Anvin "<hpa@zytor.com>," Rafael J . Wysocki
"<rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>," Peter Zijlstra
"<peterz@infradead.org>," Sohil Mehta "<sohil.mehta@intel.com>,"
Brian Gerst "<brgerst@gmail.com>," Patryk Wlazlyn "
<patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:06:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250706030636.397197-4-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250706030636.397197-1-me@linux.beauty>
From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
The #ifdeffery and the initializers in build_sched_topology() are just
disgusting.
Statically initialize the domain levels in the topology array and let
build_sched_topology() invalidate the package domain level when NUMA in
package is available.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 6e36306632792..cd70e5322462a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -478,32 +478,30 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
*/
static bool x86_has_numa_in_package;
-static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[6];
-
-static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
-{
- int i = 0;
-
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT);
+static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
+ SDTL(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT),
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS);
+ SDTL(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC);
+ SDTL(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC),
#endif
- /*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
- * since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
- * domains based on the SLIT.
- */
- if (!x86_has_numa_in_package)
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG);
+ SDTL(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG),
+ { NULL },
+};
+static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
+{
/*
- * There must be one trailing NULL entry left.
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package invalidate the
+ * PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
+ * right spanning domains based on the SLIT.
*/
- BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 1);
+ if (x86_has_numa_in_package) {
+ unsigned int pkgdom = ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 2;
+ memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
+ }
set_sched_topology(x86_topology);
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-06 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-06 3:06 [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level Li Chen
2025-07-06 3:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL() helper to tidy sched topology setup Li Chen
2025-07-07 5:33 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 0:24 ` Li Chen
2025-07-06 3:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/smpboot: remove redundant CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Li Chen
2025-07-06 3:06 ` Li Chen [this message]
2025-07-06 3:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-07-07 5:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250706030636.397197-4-me@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®