Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 08:42:49AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 18:55, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 20:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> > > There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > The following build errors were noticed on arm with gcc-13 and clang-20 on
> > the stable-rc 6.6.96-rc1.
> >
> > Test environments:
> > - arm
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? Yes
> > - Reproducibility? Yes
> >
> > Test regression: 6.6.96-rc1: coresight-core.c error implicit
> > declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
> >
> 
> Bisection results pointing to,
> 
>     coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits
>      [ Upstream commit a4e65842e1142aa18ef36113fbd81d614eaefe5a ]
> 
> The following patch needs to be back ported ?
>    b36e78b216e6 ("ARM: 9354/1: ptrace: Use bitfield helpers")

Thanks, that makes sense, and is easier than me fixing this up by hand
like I had tried to in one of the branches :)

Now queued up.

greg k-h