From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D71729E0FD; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751962550; cv=none; b=jzDxgCrspEm+zO4i5P0GA9DduLP1Zh/POzEitO2G0So9NJxcGvHF3VnPt/x2lKfQvLQYaJrm299IqlP5VTlhQh017Ere1CnA0j9z2T09wrTxAOcnVAnREIYNc7nhLcc/dk/tP8tcx1l0E2+r0nKpmpcqPZhQkE2m9/lhPecQQpE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751962550; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4IXCxN8x8dRMEj0XOpaisABRJ9TwS7xrANdPltngbXg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IfuARI6KSaS2VVjVqw0q0qGYkv+SbXjwc1xztSq6NFSXInRLjF9t05avXEUpQegwfpDFLIPW7du42XUsYU4RE/gckJR/G1tH8LgJFQdhrwtrlQkeMIDEbnfGntY/cYkOsRlXwjWbi7kEN6umHBIg9q4m4OQrprDzYbNnJ87ZSI4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oCxjOoTT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oCxjOoTT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93906C4CEED; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:15:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751962549; bh=4IXCxN8x8dRMEj0XOpaisABRJ9TwS7xrANdPltngbXg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oCxjOoTTNd7Er+9A0ERmiDxRTufY7b1KP8XLKf6mZ1DoKVMDWJfZBIOzenjH5yMao GzKEzy1/p+HT2YqxfOgSCoKBzUi+LNbTrQaRA9w4NXBPKJ2Xkz0hJ2z1SDTZohnZ4R OVqaibSkMPL88qqUJJ9+db1VP8aIe+rhjphpT19gINNLilduYiKQLU69D2oeLggesB cwu7ViA4q/LTzK0mYjJmyNSjiYA6+Vg7MNLB8gjBf9m9x9UesOkLdVaePGQ/SQrsgJ tCA+/70Opl+yi8ZqMf8TVblFdrn01heK5vQ3Um7h3Er4RvBdo1DA1Rjc/PqUZHisbo 8+IIjf0TGNcLw== Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:15:45 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Al Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the vfs-brauner tree Message-ID: <20250708-podest-waldbestand-1d2bcbabad8c@brauner> References: <20250708093837.52e3a89d@canb.auug.org.au> <20250708002509.GR1880847@ZenIV> <20250708004550.GS1880847@ZenIV> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250708004550.GS1880847@ZenIV> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 01:45:50AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 01:25:09AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > Umm... Let's do it that way - fs/fhandle.c chunk of that commit is > > trivially split off and the rest should not conflict at all. > > > > Christian, would you mind throwing this on top of your vfs.pidfs? I'm dropping > > that part from my #work.misc commit... > > Argh... Sorry, no go - that chunk needs to go before the rest of conversion > commit. Hmm... > > See vfs/vfs.git #vfs-6.17.fs_struct; that branches off your "reflow" commit > and it merges clean with #vfs.all, AFAICS. > > Are you OK with that variant? I've no strong preferences re branchpoints, > but some folks do - no idea if you have any policies in that respect. Whatever makes collaboration here easier I'm happy to go with! Thanks for jumping on this so quicly? > If you don't have any problems with it, just merge it into #vfs.all > and I'll drop that commit from #work.misc Sure! Let me grab it.