From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F31268683 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751970342; cv=none; b=uj690YJZUOf3dFKwpusVFBc4SeuexIsYuUDK/GTBzm2RZ//cDXALMABlRbvuz25J8XaV+S4N5MI/euZWlm2c9dW/pL17HRimJRqsJtvpNTi7lxuaHrVIB32/DN7xlDlBO8RAu9XJPFp4ZE8y7hzymCx3fpzgr9uWF7swd4rpZAM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751970342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uI87pg5WcASFWD0K32gMteBkyUzucAaePK9YFfv8YtU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KtwMt43M99L4B6OlFhfKdXMFk83XGrhIF89vu+M5hBecmjgYfP7EGvgb2ydXK4B8dFJT3ZvJsi7wEHQdFXDrYBIbf5oxB5PhsKSBFwsnzY7ntLIR6ZtB7NJ4myJ71W2S71Nr9r/AD6MlBpoT2/aZYCu6Ncv3v1oYW5Oh4mUfV/M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=arZRCAeW; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=qU4A+HRM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="arZRCAeW"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="qU4A+HRM" Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 12:25:37 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1751970338; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mrZZuWaHaXVZ4tU14vD0jFwEhA7UyuVBekyaX6/jSvQ=; b=arZRCAeWw4M0tWg+Jv2ndJMHzY8loL+3L+xj7PSSU9OdKuA6ViYhAw/7UlQAs+TH2mOWwZ fUCMdcrQkSKXtCY5zMIL+gadeIxglMe7LfXqm9GN+gSRvJGqjIS0PBETAGMRVMghQbBiaB uZLxR3cOAngVQbQY0Lf+cL0EBnL5qcZeiI8mj6tSBzkhPMgZVZz0+2O0sl1WbzCNoWOlE0 A1ZOPrxO1Nna+DAbKMw0OdV+I8sZANeetQqIJokP/DlJlrw0mlyLDQuQk8d4BjQ8Kej3Ee gK0BsdO/FSWo5hjqmxunZvuCQnmIVLdVsZR69JG28BsONGkEobGnQu0Lqelm1Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1751970338; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mrZZuWaHaXVZ4tU14vD0jFwEhA7UyuVBekyaX6/jSvQ=; b=qU4A+HRMxnXbegaEoeOrkeKk7TR725nLMk8ItxqFSKNkBPROlWCShUsoKrjWvD64mui6Se EJwnKQR3YnQdZKCA== From: Nam Cao To: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] riscv: kprobes: Clean up instruction simulation Message-ID: <20250708102537.VovauOQC@linutronix.de> References: <174904758698.2309006.9940004806769596353.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <174904758698.2309006.9940004806769596353.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:33:06PM +0000, patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org wrote: > Hello: > > This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) > by Alexandre Ghiti : > > On Wed, 14 May 2025 11:38:39 +0200 you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is some instruction-processing code in kprobes simulate code. These > > code should be insn.h. In fact, most of them is duplicating insn.h. > > > > This series remove the duplicated bits and make use of macros already > > defined in insn.h. The non-duplicated bits are moved into insn.h. > > > > [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [v2,01/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_rs2_idx to insn.h > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/d29656bab74c > - [v2,02/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_funct3 to insn.h > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/da6de46c2eed > - [v2,03/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/6d47d903b18f > - [v2,04/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_RS1_REG > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/5cefc323f32a > - [v2,05/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_BTYPE_IMM > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a285674909ae > - [v2,06/11] riscv: kproves: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c7196c136e29 > - [v2,07/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_C2_RS1_REG > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/768007ca3fe8 > - [v2,08/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RVC_EXTRACT_BTYPE_IMM > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/f2c715fff676 > - [v2,09/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_RD_REG > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/284ca2a100de > - [v2,10/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_UTYPE_IMM > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a60c2933ec74 > - [v2,11/11] riscv: kprobes: Remove duplication of RV_EXTRACT_ITYPE_IMM > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/ee4c45f5cbeb This series was dropped from 6.16 due to conflict. Can it be re-applied? It applies cleanly to riscv/for-next. The same story for: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/174904758974.2309006.8809303189389627595.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/ Best regards, Nam