From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, dw@davidwei.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netdevsim: implement peer queue flow control
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 18:27:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708182718.29c4ae45@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250703-netdev_flow_control-v2-1-ab00341c9cc1@debian.org>
On Thu, 03 Jul 2025 06:09:31 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> +static int nsim_napi_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct nsim_rq *rq,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (skb_queue_len(&rq->skb_queue) > NSIM_RING_SIZE) {
> + nsim_stop_peer_tx_queue(dev, rq, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> return NET_RX_DROP;
> }
we should probably add:
if (skb_queue_len(&rq->skb_queue) > NSIM_RING_SIZE)
nsim_stop_tx_queue(dev, rq, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
after enqueuing the skb, so that we stop the queue before any drops
happen
> @@ -51,7 +109,7 @@ static int nsim_napi_rx(struct nsim_rq *rq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> static int nsim_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct nsim_rq *rq)
> {
> - return __dev_forward_skb(dev, skb) ?: nsim_napi_rx(rq, skb);
> + return __dev_forward_skb(dev, skb) ?: nsim_napi_rx(dev, rq, skb);
> }
>
> static netdev_tx_t nsim_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
nsim_start_xmit() has both dev and peer_dev, pass them all the way to
nsim_stop_peer_tx_queue() so that you don't have to try to dereference
the peer again.
> + if (dev->real_num_tx_queues != peer_dev->num_rx_queues)
given that we compare real_num_tx_queues I think we should also kick
the queues in nsim_set_channels(), like we do in unlink_device_store()
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-03 13:09 Breno Leitao
2025-07-09 1:27 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-09 10:34 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-09 21:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-11 16:29 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250708182718.29c4ae45@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®