From: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, frederic@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
urezki@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com,
neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com,
"Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 1/3] srcu: Expedite SRCU-fast grace periods
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:15:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250709104555.15670-2-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709104555.15670-1-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Currently, SRCU-fast grace periods use synchronize_rcu() to provide the
needed ordering with readers, even given an expedited SRCU-fast grace
period, which isn't all that expedited. This commit therefore instead
uses synchronize_rcu_expedited() if there is an expedited SRCU-fast
grace period in flight.
Of course, given an non-expedited SRCU-fast grace period blocked in
synchronize_rcu(), a later request for an expedited SRCU-fast grace
period will wait for that synchronize_rcu() to return before switching
to use of synchronize_rcu_expedited(). If this turns out to be a real
problem for a production workload, we can increase the complexity (but
likely also degrade the energy efficiency) to speed things up further.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 48047260697e..c5e8ebc493d5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -502,6 +502,8 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
*/
if (!did_gp)
smp_mb(); /* A */
+ else if (srcu_gp_is_expedited(ssp))
+ synchronize_rcu_expedited(); /* X */
else
synchronize_rcu(); /* X */
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 10:45 [PATCH rcu 0/3] SRCU changes for v6.17 neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 10:45 ` neeraj.upadhyay [this message]
2025-07-09 10:45 ` [PATCH rcu 2/3] srcu: Remove SRCU-lite implementation neeraj.upadhyay
2025-07-09 10:45 ` [PATCH rcu 3/3] checkpatch: Remove SRCU-lite deprecation neeraj.upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250709104555.15670-2-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®