mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw, Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize GCD performance on RISC-V by selecting implementation at runtime
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:20:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250709162053.0389d4068832d98bd11daa00@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606134758.1308400-1-visitorckw@gmail.com>

On Fri,  6 Jun 2025 21:47:55 +0800 Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com> wrote:

> The current implementation of gcd() selects between the binary GCD and
> the odd-even GCD algorithm at compile time, depending on whether
> CONFIG_CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS is set. On platforms like RISC-V, however,
> this compile-time decision can be misleading: even when the compiler
> emits ctz instructions based on the assumption that they are efficient
> (as is the case when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB is enabled), the actual
> hardware may lack support for the Zbb extension. In such cases, ffs()
> falls back to a software implementation at runtime, making the binary
> GCD algorithm significantly slower than the odd-even variant.
> 
> To address this, we introduce a static key to allow runtime selection
> between the binary and odd-even GCD implementations. On RISC-V, the
> kernel now checks for Zbb support during boot. If Zbb is unavailable,
> the static key is disabled so that gcd() consistently uses the more
> efficient odd-even algorithm in that scenario. Additionally, to further
> reduce code size, we select CONFIG_CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS automatically
> when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB is not enabled, avoiding compilation of the
> unused binary GCD implementation entirely on systems where it would
> never be executed.
> 
> This series ensures that the most efficient GCD algorithm is used in
> practice and avoids compiling unnecessary code based on hardware
> capabilities and kernel configuration.

I removed the v2 series from mm.git and added this, thanks.

v2 was in -next for a month, no issues of which I am aware.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-06 13:47 Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-06-06 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/math/gcd: Use static key to select " Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-06-06 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] riscv: Optimize gcd() code size when CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB is disabled Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-06-12 12:59   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-06-06 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] riscv: Optimize gcd() performance on RISC-V without Zbb extension Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-06-12 13:00   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-07-09 15:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize GCD performance on RISC-V by selecting implementation at runtime Alexandre Ghiti
2025-07-09 23:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-08-10 21:12 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250709162053.0389d4068832d98bd11daa00@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=eleanor15x@gmail.com \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®