From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D72723B637; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 19:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752088183; cv=none; b=KhN3a2hehbRBqxYy7aCCXeZ0F3yAB7A0Ayu/CMk5vBlMGfGUAvbvY9zOOVebdDOXt6MPjpzrtr4WdEsitRuNNEZaMFo9gpsjNmUWwGtmaChqtUMDasiFGiMx6l1PWPFx3FpP4rbdsJ9ukXKagUoP0Yu+l1mg30d1oaskxWIO7Js= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752088183; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ty8dx0iYfVULStO7ur66hWlNQVb5KpaOASSPxta284c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gIIkcANjWS/XTwG8LaD5odTSfAiKqhZvK/QtgCiNxD54JAvv5FkZ0Z5jgXxBmkHAtJXakkPl4N87oV2JL5Nz8ykWfoBIkBL+J9rPIt5PAQ3l5r7CljFriyDuIk+7AA2+Zm0mnICHBCnJfX+j6tgwVRUyP8sLa3cemeqvzie4lUg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=EaNu3jyn; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=zzKIZjtR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="EaNu3jyn"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="zzKIZjtR" Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 21:09:38 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1752088180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yUBFQDuqZ8GkOGjWlzXp7+zn0YDamzbquE8bBOdq0OE=; b=EaNu3jyn/PxNV88DsbYBXzL8Orjct+EZzT7WD+viD9zu89YNLw/7bvkoGPqqfQ66+zHb6Z 0KBzwk/ShfdJ86KFheoBZDX9lsYnoTu05VLKsEA1FUVzPmTTKe9VvZSlROdv9vx+T8m4Mj nt4r86sqo7fIEZAivWzbo8bnzxW9082SIMIHnDYUoKWPYTlH43nTwB/bD6IXQoGSqSQnUY gspLp+cneJVUJtOnY3hQiRpErMc7P9BOh9Pig64Bc39XpvJFn6qRieAV+vLVEfm6rrha7V aaWPyqRyrYGBLDFYYNiUFTJv+P5SEJTAqIIIEjK8QcFeOFQrCgYiefTxJK1bKw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1752088180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yUBFQDuqZ8GkOGjWlzXp7+zn0YDamzbquE8bBOdq0OE=; b=zzKIZjtR3K5RZYjO2vVoVEVCc83Zep9JptZytN6rDVLGIrB77oZGSPglCrTGc2z1wxclyQ 8EDwKxaPpIMX8UAQ== From: Nam Cao To: Steven Rostedt Cc: John Ogness , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Gabriele Monaco , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/12] printk: Make vprintk_deferred() public Message-ID: <20250709190938.8KErh6st@linutronix.de> References: <25d52fcad6d1ce8f8ac262199d3e8474e029961f.1752082806.git.namcao@linutronix.de> <20250709144914.6ee7199b@batman.local.home> <20250709185334.uFpAU2mC@linutronix.de> <20250709150452.6646c168@batman.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250709150452.6646c168@batman.local.home> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 03:04:52PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I could do it, but if you send a new version, it will keep patchwork > automated. When I edit a patch, the status doesn't automatically get > updated due to the change. > > I know it's minor, but could you send a v13? Then when the patch gets > accepted in mainline, it should automatically turn to Accept in > patchwork. Fine for me either way. I worked with other maintainers who prefer the other way, so I had to ask. Nam