From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: selftests: add PHY-loopback test for bad TCP checksums
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 19:40:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250709194039.72202043@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708122823.2435505-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 14:28:23 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> if (attr->tcp) {
> int l4len = skb->len - skb_transport_offset(skb);
>
> - thdr->check = ~tcp_v4_check(l4len, ihdr->saddr, ihdr->daddr, 0);
> - skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head;
> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> + if (attr->bad_csum) {
> + __sum16 good_csum;
> + u16 bad_csum;
> +
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> + thdr->check = 0;
> + skb->csum = skb_checksum(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb),
> + l4len, 0);
> + good_csum = csum_tcpudp_magic(ihdr->saddr, ihdr->daddr,
> + l4len, IPPROTO_TCP,
> + skb->csum);
> +
> + /* Flip the least-significant bit. This is fast,
> + * deterministic, and cannot accidentally turn the
> + * checksum back into a value the stack treats as valid
> + * (0 or 0xFFFF).
> + */
> + bad_csum = (__force u16)good_csum ^ 0x0001;
> + if (bad_csum == 0 || bad_csum == 0xFFFF) {
> + /* If the checksum is 0 or 0xFFFF, flip another
> + * bit to ensure it is not valid.
> + */
> + bad_csum ^= 0x0002;
> + }
> +
> + thdr->check = (__force __sum16)bad_csum;
> + } else {
> + skb->csum = 0;
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> + thdr->check = ~tcp_v4_check(l4len, ihdr->saddr,
> + ihdr->daddr, 0);
> + skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head;
> + skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
> + }
> } else {
> + skb->csum = 0;
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> udp4_hwcsum(skb, ihdr->saddr, ihdr->daddr);
> }
I think it'd be simpler if - after setting up CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
we called skb_checksum_help() to get the correct checksum filled in
and then did the bad checksum mangling.
BTW mangling like this should be idiomatic enough to avoid the comment:
thdr->check = thdr->check ^ 1 ?: CSUM_MANGLED_0;
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 12:28 Oleksij Rempel
2025-07-10 2:40 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250709194039.72202043@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®