mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] iommufd: Do not allow _iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd if abort op is set
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:23:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250710202354.1658511-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)

An abort op was introduced to allow its caller to invoke it within a lock
in the caller's function. On the other hand, _iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd()
would invoke the abort op in iommufd_object_abort_and_destroy() that must
be outside the caller's lock. So, these two cannot work together.

Add a validation in the _iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd(). Pick -EOPNOTSUPP to
reject the function call, indicating that the object allocator is buggy.

Suggested-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
index 0fb81a905cb1..69c2195e77ca 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
@@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ struct iommufd_object *_iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd,
 	if (WARN_ON(ucmd->new_obj))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 
+	/*
+	 * An abort op means that its caller needs to invoke it within a lock in
+	 * the caller. So it doesn't work with _iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd() that
+	 * will invoke the abort op in iommufd_object_abort_and_destroy(), which
+	 * must be outside the caller's lock.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON(iommufd_object_ops[type].abort))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+
 	new_obj = _iommufd_object_alloc(ucmd->ictx, size, type);
 	if (IS_ERR(new_obj))
 		return new_obj;
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-10 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10 20:23 Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-07-11  3:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-11  9:40   ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-14 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250710202354.1658511-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®