From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF7452F2C5C for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752258530; cv=none; b=HhyT8btJ1NWYUpEAB4BnQgbac06WxqbALUgaUm/6jNrgouSf0HFheN1wjk2vv47YZbggOgXO9totyDWK/dgFTG3+YaI+3HiZFdKifGWRPZPu2rhkI/NBc8WzSdh7nnM6gQ8UJ4iWMc5FtPzxNl+mZyzxpQzI5lvOdUayvy/rHQk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752258530; c=relaxed/simple; bh=outJhnfIPj3CtWBSGlrgZTEfaH9N0Vkd8cGgr9/YQTk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OJPPGBs0lnQ1rCjiAzKHEkezL0fmMOk9v3QcPsPpRJ1v5deRnjarssHjMNif8LiRKvi5Ynutg94Edn9z/OSTwVHpIisi5WItelAtoqOX0Zft7JaXTyqs36Hko61otJxH+zgddxB3gz9O6YZkBaX6i33aeKD/SGBZKg2KUZ8AZZ4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A1D16037E; Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ED04280013; Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:28:34 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Greg KH Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf , Masami Hiramatsu , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Andrii Nakryiko , Indu Bhagat , "Jose E. Marchesi" , Beau Belgrave , Jens Remus , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] unwind: Export unwind_user symbol to GPL modules Message-ID: <20250711142834.73b2864c@batman.local.home> In-Reply-To: <2025071104-amnesty-flashback-b883@gregkh> References: <20250709212556.32777-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20250709212556.32777-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20250711065742.00d6668b@gandalf.local.home> <2025071124-cola-slouching-9dd2@gregkh> <20250711091734.5632dcf7@gandalf.local.home> <2025071127-reunion-residence-c0f2@gregkh> <20250711133240.0d5b6de8@batman.local.home> <2025071104-amnesty-flashback-b883@gregkh> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: ED04280013 X-Stat-Signature: i3z4faxtrmkozuk5qxyz18e7fzsyk5r8 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout06 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX19pg25gEp69pG4NS/hQ9JTRR813gkb9KVA= X-HE-Tag: 1752258515-552660 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/7CrFkhCQXB5of5GMFPGqL6fg8KBhpdO53QEOz+7ZrVoyC1gU8cld4BJu4xCBhEXBiNfRj7IN67Z4M3w/zUD07BhfvkERxYFJfeDlExeCMbhIqok2NQTf2ezuwzCEQLj46yhQSJlDijRZl+cT9EeVHucBuIibkbMn6FGMPrlhuVREug1yUcc7iFZ9OPIs2cEO5+/F56V8N4W4V4vvzJYOdC/qkfv11TAYjp1ABGyO0a7Sgs4MgM/krUQGK1tsVkuAHHQgfqx9th3dxZQAFz4gzGZp6/Ij2OUhgYSVPUFLQXEIspEIZWSNg/d5nzal3y15tKwyHudKUEmI+K8JjJaYD730nkHnmxBH0rviLvDgTbvVSYAPb5M2N On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:24:37 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 01:32:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > So get the lttng code merged into the tree please, it seems that you are > > > the one objecting to the merge, not me :) > > > > It was actually others, and it was years ago. Perhaps we could just > > accept the LTTng kernel module as is, as a module, and leave it at that? > > That's up to the maintainers of the subsystem where it would be, not me. It would likely be its own subsystem (under kernel/lttng?), so I guess it would be Linus's decision. -- Steve