From: Darshan Rathod <darshanrathod475@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Darshan Rathod <darshanrathod475@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: gpio: Use explicit 'unsigned int' for parameter types
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:59:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250716095906.21812-1-darshanrathod475@gmail.com> (raw)
The C standard allows 'unsigned' as a shorthand for 'unsigned int'.
For improved code clarity and consistency with the prevailing kernel coding
style, replace the shorthand with the more explicit 'unsigned int' type
for function parameters.
This is a purely stylistic cleanup and has no functional impact on the
generated code.
Signed-off-by: Darshan Rathod <darshanrathod475@gmail.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
index ea5f1b10b79e..c8dadb532c40 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static inline int getmiso(const struct spi_device *spi)
*/
static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode0(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
return bitbang_txrx_le_cpha0(spi, nsecs, 0, flags, word, bits);
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode0(struct spi_device *spi,
}
static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode1(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
return bitbang_txrx_le_cpha1(spi, nsecs, 0, flags, word, bits);
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode1(struct spi_device *spi,
}
static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode2(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
return bitbang_txrx_le_cpha0(spi, nsecs, 1, flags, word, bits);
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode2(struct spi_device *spi,
}
static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode3(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
return bitbang_txrx_le_cpha1(spi, nsecs, 1, flags, word, bits);
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_txrx_word_mode3(struct spi_device *spi,
*/
static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode0(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
flags = spi->controller->flags;
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode0(struct spi_device *spi,
}
static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode1(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
flags = spi->controller->flags;
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode1(struct spi_device *spi,
}
static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode2(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
flags = spi->controller->flags;
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode2(struct spi_device *spi,
}
static u32 spi_gpio_spec_txrx_word_mode3(struct spi_device *spi,
- unsigned nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned flags)
+ unsigned int nsecs, u32 word, u8 bits, unsigned int flags)
{
flags = spi->controller->flags;
if (unlikely(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 9:59 Darshan Rathod [this message]
2025-07-16 15:35 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250716095906.21812-1-darshanrathod475@gmail.com \
--to=darshanrathod475@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®