[PATCH 5/9] locking/rwsem: Use OWNER_NONSPINNABLE directly instead of OWNER_SPINNABLE

[Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>]

From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>

After commit 7d43f1ce9dd0 ("locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on
reader-owned rwsem"), OWNER_SPINNABLE contains all possible values except
OWNER_NONSPINNABLE, namely OWNER_NULL | OWNER_WRITER | OWNER_READER.

Therefore, it is better to use OWNER_NONSPINNABLE directly to determine
whether to exit optimistic spin.

And, remove useless OWNER_SPINNABLE to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250610130158.4876-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 2ddb827e3bea..8572dba95af4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -727,8 +727,6 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#define OWNER_SPINNABLE		(OWNER_NULL | OWNER_WRITER | OWNER_READER)
-
 static inline enum owner_state
 rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags)
 {
@@ -835,7 +833,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		enum owner_state owner_state;
 
 		owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem);
-		if (!(owner_state & OWNER_SPINNABLE))
+		if (owner_state == OWNER_NONSPINNABLE)
 			break;
 
 		/*
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)