From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C005528A1CA; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 07:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752651890; cv=none; b=gqAdBIf+/WOkeKUopwzQFX7QnRteWyKNN9FQczDUyCJLAvraycL9l2FXzsMsOPgKWzy3UQgjhRCo2fo7gzOXn7MRxQtXv+X7P0uX70et9/9jMzvbcQuIM2UR65YE4mcIE/+/uQIJrYB5Rp0efxdW/SYb7i2kKt/kWi30e50cuK4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752651890; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rakUwOidur4ow2ll0FZlBfrzzDi2qZ2wFlnPMfyI4NA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HUiYnFgunyXWREt23RRV6tMUU2hkiDU4QnvAETrh+3y5I0EDBZwInKKkzrHrRImjzyQ27E5FF3wI3PUur4oNVQ663tdkmHfRWuZUkQHvpvqesI0H2dd1j80L5ES4WkyyzNX1uid8QClrv7fLXV6bWOM3Pdo9spuVCQnHbNUW3Ns= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gadpyYC3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gadpyYC3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1752651888; x=1784187888; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rakUwOidur4ow2ll0FZlBfrzzDi2qZ2wFlnPMfyI4NA=; b=gadpyYC3uyHYPrtf2MCTJ65tdSEE3lEEXw83eC7OoqaVHvLqntxEGdbA fl9WHk81pwqDMIBU0jfB47TSF92j5aNt8BWknhQwGh+u5Yu32bHvXGN8k jS5jJrfGx5bAvM/SpCIRM9cnqS9GX+6MG661fTxsQrz4nROulgP/l0M/N uJfXwc2Xc401AbOp3vAr3ghRC6HjpyDvd4O/XIFz4QUpmaqyuGq+pXZmL GJMS6ylwiekd20lbAq0ySJXC2EkKV2IB2CXNNj4JcXrVGsiJZcnbu8YHm w0IkHZVGfPB/mXjf4pBpzZV2liJmT7f1n69oQwMqBDdbjovCMENw2wJHU Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7kvIwEdCTs2axEGqtYKTDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GojJPTdXR5aw3LB/lVHKrw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11493"; a="55036700" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,315,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55036700" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2025 00:44:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: M1j9vfWJRxC+oysMlnebtw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zyEkj1I3QwWjD+2/1+tvcg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,315,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="157096427" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9ee84586c615) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2025 00:44:44 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9ee84586c615 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ubwok-000C4F-1V; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 07:44:42 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 15:44:04 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sean Anderson , Jonathan Cameron , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Andy Shevchenko , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Sean Anderson Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support Message-ID: <202507161550.frzFNyCa-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250715012023.2050178-8-sean.anderson@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250715012023.2050178-8-sean.anderson@linux.dev> Hi Sean, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on jic23-iio/togreg] [also build test WARNING on groeck-staging/hwmon-next akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable linus/master v6.16-rc6 next-20250715] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sean-Anderson/math64-Add-div64_s64_rem/20250715-092337 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250715012023.2050178-8-sean.anderson%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support config: i386-randconfig-063-20250716 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250716/202507161550.frzFNyCa-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250716/202507161550.frzFNyCa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507161550.frzFNyCa-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c:25:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'iio_hwmon_listener_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c:26:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'iio_hwmon_listeners' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/iio_hwmon_listener_lock +25 drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c 23 24 /* Protects iio_hwmon_listeners and listeners' refcnt */ > 25 DEFINE_MUTEX(iio_hwmon_listener_lock); > 26 LIST_HEAD(iio_hwmon_listeners); 27 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki