From: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
To: <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Cc: <aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com>, <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <brgerst@gmail.com>, <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<oleg@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <vigbalas@amd.com>, <wangfushuai@baidu.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix potential NULL dereference in avx512_status()
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:12:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250718071250.36019-1-wangfushuai@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89987231-37ce-4d49-a1d7-6e699e8ab0d2@intel.com>
>> Can you please share any other warnings that were triggered before this
>> Oops message? Also, I'll try to generate this locally. Any specific
>> configuration needed for reproducing this apart from CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU?
>
>I was able to reproduce this on a system with X86_FEATURE_AVX512F. The
>issue only happens while reading arch_status on a kthread.
>
>$cat /proc/[kthread]/arch_status => NULL pointer exception
>$cat /proc/[user thread]/arch_status => No issue seen
>
>Can you confirm that you are seeing the same behavior?
Confirmed, same issue here.
>Unfortunately, avx512_timestamp resides within struct fpu. So getting
>that value for a kthread would mean going through x86_task_fpu().
>
>I am wondering if we ever need to expose the AVX512 usage for kernel
>threads? If not, then we can do what you currently have but without the
>CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU restriction. All kernel threads would always print
>the AVX512_elapsed_ms as -1.
>
>However, this would be a user visible change so we should probably get
>more inputs. I tried this experiment on an older kernel without the
>above issue. Among all the active kthreads on my system a handful of
>them show a valid value for AVX512 usage. The rest of them all show -1.
>
>PID: 2594
>CMD: avahi-daemon: running [SAP.local]
> /proc/2594/arch_status content:
>AVX512_elapsed_ms: 46032
>
>PID: 2729
>CMD: sshd: /usr/sbin/sshd -D [listener] 0 of 10-100 startups
> /proc/2729/arch_status content:
>AVX512_elapsed_ms: 396656
>
>To keep the older behavior, we might need to consider moving
>avx512_timestamp out of struct fpu. Though, I am uncertain about its
>implication.
I think avx512_elapsed_ms should logically belong in the FPU structure,
as it's a field inherently tied to FPU operations? To keep the older
behavior, we can set CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU=n, maybe?
Is there a better approach to ensure kernel threads always correctly output
avx512_elapsed_ms. Directly get FPU struct pointer without using x86_task_fpu()?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
index 9aa9ac8399ae..f989bc125e9b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
@@ -1859,9 +1859,10 @@ long fpu_xstate_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2)
*/
static void avx512_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
{
- unsigned long timestamp = READ_ONCE(x86_task_fpu(task)->avx512_timestamp);
+ unsigned long timestamp;
long delta;
+ timestamp = READ_ONCE((struct fpu *)((void *)(task) + sizeof(*(task)))->avx512_timestamp);
if (!timestamp) {
/*
* Report -1 if no AVX512 usage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 9:43 Fushuai Wang
2025-07-17 19:21 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-07-18 6:21 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-07-18 7:12 ` Fushuai Wang [this message]
2025-07-18 23:48 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-07-21 14:09 ` Dave Hansen
2025-07-22 5:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250718071250.36019-1-wangfushuai@baidu.com \
--to=wangfushuai@baidu.com \
--cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vigbalas@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®