From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rv: Remove the nop reactor
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:10:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721141050.E-MjrEbf@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <feae7a189afa69091816074dcf66a496b11bdd38.camel@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 12:29:24PM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-07-21 at 11:47 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > As suggested by the name, the nop reactor does not do anything. It is
> > the
> > default reactor when nothing else is selected.
> >
> > However, the monitors already null-check the reactor function
> > pointers.
> > Thus, instead of a nop reactor, just set the react function pointer
> > to
> > NULL. The nop reactor can then be removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
>
> Thanks for the patch, I'd need to go through this a bit more in detail.
>
> As far as I remember, the only way to disable reaction is to set it to
> the nop reactor.
> With your patch the behaviour changes and, to disable the reactor, you
> now need to write an empty string, this should be documented somewhere,
> at the very least. Perhaps userspace tools (tools/verification/rv)
> might break and would need adaptation.
>
> We could still remove the kernel side implementation, but from
> userspace (tracefs) we might want to keep the nop reactor available,
> setting it would set the reactor to NULL under the hood.
>
> If you really want to change also the user space interface, we might
> want to imitate other tracefs features and use something like printk /
> !printk to enable/disable a reactor.
>
> What do you think? Did I miss anything here?
You didn't miss anything, I miss that this "nop" interface is inspired by
tracefs.
Although I prefer writing empty string, compared to writing "nop"; it is
better to be consistent with tracefs.
Let me drop this patch.
Best regards,
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 9:47 [PATCH 0/6] rv: Clean up & simplify Nam Cao
2025-07-21 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] rv: Remove unused field in struct rv_monitor_def Nam Cao
2025-07-21 13:01 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-21 9:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] rv: Merge struct rv_monitor_def into struct rv_monitor Nam Cao
2025-07-21 14:13 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-21 9:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] rv: Merge struct rv_reactor_def into struct rv_reactor Nam Cao
2025-07-21 14:29 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-21 9:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] rv: Remove rv_reactor's reference counter Nam Cao
2025-07-21 13:20 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-21 14:04 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-21 15:49 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-22 8:27 ` Nam Cao
2025-07-22 8:30 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-21 9:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] rv: Remove the nop reactor Nam Cao
2025-07-21 10:29 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-21 14:10 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2025-07-21 9:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] rv: Remove struct rv_monitor::reacting Nam Cao
2025-07-21 14:38 ` Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250721141050.E-MjrEbf@linutronix.de \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®