mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com>
To: jassisinghbrar@gmail.com
Cc: alexey.klimov@arm.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	joonwonkang@google.com,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,  sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com
Subject: 
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:58:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250722075836.2295285-1-joonwonkang@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABb+yY3CBiLpZ1KrD8RFypRgkP9MOzBf1FB+gL2E-qEuSbrj6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:04=E2=80=AFAM Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.co=
m> wrote:
>>
>> Previously, a sender thread in mbox_send_message() could be woken up at
>> a wrong time in blocking mode. It is because there was only a single
>> completion for a channel whereas messages from multiple threads could be
>> sent in any order; since the shared completion could be signalled in any
>> order, it could wake up a wrong sender thread.
>>
>> This commit resolves the false wake-up issue with the following changes:
>> - Completions are created as many as the number of concurrent sender
>>   threads
>> - A completion is created in a sender thread's stack
>> - Each slot of the message queue, i.e. `msg_data`, contains a pointer to
>>   its target completion
>> - tx_tick() signals the completion of the currently active slot of the
>>   message queue
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1490809381-28869-1-git-send-email-jaswi=
>nder.singh@linaro.org
>
> Is your issue different from what is described in the Link?
>
> thanks

The issue is the same, but the solution is different.

The previous solution in the Link tried to have per-message completion; each
completion belongs to each slot of the message queue. However, the solution in
this patch tries to have per-thread completion; each completion belongs to each
sender thread and each slot of the message queue has a pointer to that
completion; `struct mbox_message` has the "pointer" field
`struct completion *tx_complete` which points to the completion which is
created in the stack of the sender instead of owning the completion by having
the non-pointer field `struct completion tx_complete`. This way, we could avoid
the window where the same completion is reused by different sender threads
which could lead to a wrong completion order, IMHO.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18  8:03 [PATCH 1/2] mailbox: Use per-thread completion to fix wrong completion order Joonwon Kang
2025-07-20 21:13 ` Jassi Brar
2025-07-22  6:46   ` Joonwon Kang
2025-07-22  6:50   ` Joonwon Kang
2025-07-22  7:58   ` Joonwon Kang [this message]
2025-07-22  8:15   ` Joonwon Kang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250722075836.2295285-1-joonwonkang@google.com \
    --to=joonwonkang@google.com \
    --cc=alexey.klimov@arm.com \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®