From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34DB628B7ED; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 23:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753226923; cv=none; b=k1eNfIo9l6CnMozznoq7eYzS8Ll5R7pW0dlP60amacu13l9KsPMHR0fdBwnCdcDI0ce4LP9mPT8eyxPRB3eHzNeoHxY545eQdAH+c91/HyYRqC86NGbmXeU9XYz+RG84eDgiclryswBbfgFGkf/eDVfQlz8EJnvm+9vEAfRQ4FA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753226923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NfWlAbo8emHsOzVdyWi3yZFqexjd4Z9Fxp5x8vVpAuM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hmfUyFkhf8a+XQ2eTC1aoiGOiJ51lkilujkBbJ/qZR539A+WjNoBMOVj2z/W4PuWhR6HU6kFJTrFHVaFZcnj4kZOaJYxIRdAihqyhtO4HfBlpoQUlDuvWYoRuNA+8Gbeognr89OQKXVtw6YVA3qLRRbg5h0ZsDviZjhYhaGiDCo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZqaMGFLw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZqaMGFLw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5AA9C4CEEB; Tue, 22 Jul 2025 23:28:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753226922; bh=NfWlAbo8emHsOzVdyWi3yZFqexjd4Z9Fxp5x8vVpAuM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZqaMGFLw1bXSMKkvYCa20hzuYvhFicL5Loq5D6fdDI/yC2XNXbOREA55DpucN3eVG f0raIK7PUdJfif+3n2UlEDrzw97PvHkwSmQQQuH8eLeRq/nE2xWG5qou5wa2hYJxHp 1Y4grPXgP0rFzZa9VzT4IBTSSAaxouwtwomfn2QDtFcskGGYsCgGpJs2D7+XTXvLAx ucyCmfZjXFiollw91AT0kqwatlmOiV2uj2DXrpaIRS/k9OeS8HHNE2rKGKZkRY7vWg BjvU2GfzqKlc1mPdAxFsTIED6m7+uhXwajeAPZNsuua0mnthVwqQ5WWgY0FuGcRN0K lSmetWC0Dk6ug== Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:28:42 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Carlos Maiolino , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xfs: more unused events from linux-next Message-ID: <20250722232842.GV2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250722201907.886429445@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250722201907.886429445@kernel.org> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 04:19:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I reran the unused tracepoint code on the latest linux-next and found more > xfs trace events. One was recently added but the rest were there before. Not > sure how I missed them. > > But anyway, here's a few more patches to remove unused xfs trace events. > > Steven Rostedt (4): > xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_dqreclaim_dirty > xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_log_cil_return > xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_discard_rtrelax > xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_reflink_cow_enospc I can directly take responsibility for 1, 3, and 4 -- those aren't going to come back. Patch 2 looks like an accidental add, and if anyone wants it they can always add it back. Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > > ---- > fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) >