From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Libing He <libhe@redhat.com>, David Arcari <darcari@redhat.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD: Ignore invalid reset reason value
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:34:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250723183426.GA1158000@yaz-khff2.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722165615.GCaH_CryG7kNrAS4O6@renoirsky.local>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 06:56:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 06:11:54PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > The reset reason value may be "all bits set", e.g. 0xFFFFFFFF. This is a
> > commonly used error response from hardware. This may occur due to a real
> > hardware issue or when running in a VM.
>
> Well, which is it Libing is reporting? VM or a real hw issue?
>
In this case, it was a VM.
> If it is a VM, is that -1 the only thing a VMM returns when reading that
> MMIO address or can it be anything?
>
> If latter, you need to check X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR.
>
> Same for a real hw issue.
>
> IOW, is -1 the *only* invalid data we can read here or are we playing
> whack-a-mole with it?
>
I see you're point, but I don't think we can know for sure all possible
cases. There are some reserved bits that shouldn't be set. But these
definitions could change in the future.
And it'd be a pain to try and verify combinations of bits and configs.
Like can bit A and B be set together, or can bit C be set while running
in a VM, or can bit D ever be set on Model Z?
The -1 (all bits set) is the only "applies to all cases" invalid data,
since this is a common hardware error response. So we can at least check
for this.
Thanks,
Yazen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-23 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 18:11 Yazen Ghannam
2025-07-21 18:11 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-07-21 18:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-22 16:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-07-23 18:34 ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2025-07-23 19:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-07-23 19:46 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-07-24 20:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-24 21:02 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-24 21:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-25 6:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-15 21:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-15 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-15 22:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-16 8:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-18 14:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 14:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-18 15:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 14:52 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Yazen Ghannam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250723183426.GA1158000@yaz-khff2.amd.com \
--to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darcari@redhat.com \
--cc=libhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®