mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, japo@linux.ibm.com,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] libbpf: eBPF fails on events with auxiliary data
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 11:34:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250725093405.3629253-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

On linux-next
commit b4c658d4d63d61 ("perf target: Remove uid from target")
introduces a regression on s390. In fact the regression exists
on all platforms when the event supports auxiliary data gathering.

Command
   # ./perf record -u 0 -aB --synth=no -- ./perf test -w thloop
   [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
   [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB perf.data ]
   # ./perf report --stats | grep SAMPLE
   #

does not generate samples in the perf.data file.
On x86 command 
  # sudo perf record -e intel_pt// -u 0 ls
is broken too.

Looking at the sequence of calls in 'perf record' reveals this
behavior:
1. The event 'cycles' is created and enabled:
   record__open()
   +-> evlist__apply_filters()
       +-> perf_bpf_filter__prepare()
	   +-> bpf_program.attach_perf_event()
	       +-> bpf_program.attach_perf_event_opts()
	           +-> __GI___ioctl(..., PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, ...)
   The event 'cycles' is enabled and active now. However the event's
   ring-buffer to store the samples generated by hardware is not
   allocated yet. This happens now after enabling the event:

2. The event's fd is mmap() to create the ring buffer:
   record__open()
   +-> record__mmap()
       +-> record__mmap_evlist()
	   +-> evlist__mmap_ex()
	       +-> perf_evlist__mmap_ops()
	           +-> mmap_per_cpu()
	               +-> mmap_per_evsel()
	                   +-> mmap__mmap()
	                       +-> perf_mmap__mmap()
	                           +-> mmap()

   This allocates the ring-buffer for the event 'cycles'.  With mmap()
   the kernel creates the ring buffer:

   perf_mmap(): kernel function to create the event's ring
   |            buffer to save the sampled data.
   |
   +-> ring_buffer_attach(): Allocates memory for ring buffer.
       |        The PMU has auxiliary data setup function. The
       |        has_aux(event) condition is true and the PMU's
       |        stop() is called to stop sampling. It is not
       |        restarted:
       |        if (has_aux(event))
       |                perf_event_stop(event, 0);
       |
       +-> cpumsf_pmu_stop():

   Hardware sampling is stopped. No samples are generated and saved
   anymore.

3. After the event 'cycles' has been mapped, the event is enabled a
   second time in:
   __cmd_record()
   +-> evlist__enable()
       +-> __evlist__enable()
	   +-> evsel__enable_cpu()
	       +-> perf_evsel__enable_cpu()
	           +-> perf_evsel__run_ioctl()
	               +-> perf_evsel__ioctl()
	                   +-> __GI___ioctl(., PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, .)
   The second
      ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0);
   is just a NOP in this case. The first invocation in (1.) sets the
   event::state to PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE. The kernel functions
   perf_ioctl()
   +-> _perf_ioctl()
       +-> _perf_event_enable()
           +-> __perf_event_enable() returns immediately because
	              event::state is already set to
		      PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE.

This happens on s390, because the event 'cycles' offers the possibility
to save auxilary data. The PMU call backs setup_aux() and
free_aux() are defined. Without both call back functions,
cpumsf_pmu_stop() is not invoked and sampling continues.

To remedy this, remove the first invocation of
   ioctl(..., PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, ...).
in step (1.) Create the event in step (1.) and enable it in step (3.)
after the ring buffer has been mapped.

Output after:
 # ./perf record -aB --synth=no -u 0 -- ./perf test -w thloop 2
 [ perf record: Woken up 3 times to write data ]
 [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.876 MB perf.data ]
 # ./perf  report --stats | grep SAMPLE
              SAMPLE events:      16200  (99.5%)
              SAMPLE events:      16200
 #

The software event succeeded before and after the patch:
 # ./perf record -e cpu-clock -aB --synth=no -u 0 -- ./perf test -w thloop 2
 [ perf record: Woken up 7 times to write data ]
 [ perf record: Captured and wrote 2.870 MB perf.data ]
 # ./perf  report --stats | grep SAMPLE
              SAMPLE events:      53506  (99.8%)
              SAMPLE events:      53506
 #

Fixes: 63f2f5ee856ba ("libbpf: add ability to attach/detach BPF program to perf event")
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 162ebd16a59f..5973412a1031 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10960,12 +10960,6 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_perf_event_opts(const struct bpf_program *p
 		}
 		link->link.fd = pfd;
 	}
-	if (ioctl(pfd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0) < 0) {
-		err = -errno;
-		pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to enable perf_event FD %d: %s\n",
-			prog->name, pfd, errstr(err));
-		goto err_out;
-	}
 
 	return &link->link;
 err_out:
-- 
2.50.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-25  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-25  9:34 Thomas Richter [this message]
2025-07-25 14:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-07-31  7:41   ` Thomas Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250725093405.3629253-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=japo@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®