From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACACD23D2A1 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753528236; cv=none; b=ZQpXoy54s07ewGDdXyQF8zgLVdeBQmRySuqOytvjK4s27G+j6sqvz1S3EdWz8uJB5PoJHCTCWSD0zxeM53lQZR/ZCaiYUENGuhmHGBxQsMGmV3nHJiN5a2467iYKieg6rDEkX3SrINs/fnEZ2LNsoqY2tQSU6iw01Ndi5DS5/M0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753528236; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UMCcVYsotsVlB3gqcvdhIUZ3BeNnGlt6WBjFL9Fw4Rk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WR6n27MTXW8KIGQyJECUhSkd6JWB1q8FmJGEy6tIc0ZfRmNILB5NZgmAM2MnPAPXgBDIHtgDSWKYLEFmRyX4o3To65DtJhyW2Jp3WU9t0QRytoysXb1wuzOUzldRSsBLd7DXJw/2ylEPNZE1jOwPwhNU5Q6jn35b+s76EhDParI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ng6z2KdI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ng6z2KdI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1753528234; x=1785064234; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UMCcVYsotsVlB3gqcvdhIUZ3BeNnGlt6WBjFL9Fw4Rk=; b=Ng6z2KdImGGd3VP0UzN3PSYCbMqQRZjtwSK4LJjAEp+hn0ohaiO0zduF bchDFXgt7el9vMbYV4cqOn1BiSHx/Mn5/57n4Z7obh1KO5CoLhyER+r7B vVBzn7uWtYZec1j6e37HBltYbQg0VK+rpikksoP95G9zEdMykPVJ+cPqb QRC6tHtX83jVf+cYujmyYj4ywWH4td13BaOaZAZ4o5c95eVRrKGYBTXQb oMYQmi4EGyr3v5QDr0kR1+dbRAPiciIoKt96+QMRnmGURkFw+XhM0uq1X 4karJOCtRXc4nPDET6ATwNoFyyypOPpT0uamKrcSeLddKpZBikqwiqq/p A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: d5VNRZYQSr2WN5dFgiLzDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vYCfn3fkRMecswjsMuesfw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11503"; a="55057928" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,339,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55057928" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jul 2025 04:10:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EJG24i+6RqSQiqQjoMiUgw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PBODKjChRlO5kTuwV5iXVQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,339,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="192442294" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9ee84586c615) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2025 04:10:30 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9ee84586c615 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ufcnM-000Lut-0G; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 11:10:28 +0000 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 19:10:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yang Shi , ryan.roberts@arm.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Miko.Lenczewski@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 is not supported on secondary CPUs Message-ID: <202507261822.ikaBRFsG-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250724221216.1998696-5-yang@os.amperecomputing.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250724221216.1998696-5-yang@os.amperecomputing.com> Hi Yang, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on next-20250724] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core akpm-mm/mm-everything v6.16-rc7 v6.16-rc6 v6.16-rc5 linus/master v6.16-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Shi/arm64-Enable-permission-change-on-arm64-kernel-block-mappings/20250725-061534 base: next-20250724 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250724221216.1998696-5-yang%40os.amperecomputing.com patch subject: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 is not supported on secondary CPUs config: arm64-randconfig-001-20250726 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250726/202507261822.ikaBRFsG-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250726/202507261822.ikaBRFsG-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507261822.ikaBRFsG-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/mm/mmu.o: in function `linear_map_split_to_ptes': mmu.c:(.init.text+0x23c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_LDST32_ABS_LO12_NC against symbol `repaint_done' defined in .data section in arch/arm64/mm/proc.o >> aarch64-linux-ld: mmu.c:(.init.text+0x23c): warning: one possible cause of this error is that the symbol is being referenced in the indicated code as if it had a larger alignment than was declared where it was defined -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki