From: Qing Wong <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, song@kernel.org,
Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: Don't need a definition of the perf fallback-attr
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 11:25:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250727032516.10063-1-wangqing7171@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
The 'hardlockup_config_perf_event()' only overwrites the type and
config of the perf attr. It's wasteful that redefining a big static
variable to fallback. It’s just a matter of simply fallback these
two variables.
Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
---
kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
index 75af12ff774e..08b9acbd2aa4 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -92,14 +92,6 @@ static struct perf_event_attr wd_hw_attr = {
.disabled = 1,
};
-static struct perf_event_attr fallback_wd_hw_attr = {
- .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
- .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
- .size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
- .pinned = 1,
- .disabled = 1,
-};
-
/* Callback function for perf event subsystem */
static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
@@ -114,6 +106,12 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event,
watchdog_hardlockup_check(smp_processor_id(), regs);
}
+static void fallback_wd_hw_attr(void)
+{
+ wd_hw_attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
+ wd_hw_attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
+}
+
static int hardlockup_detector_event_create(void)
{
unsigned int cpu;
@@ -133,8 +131,7 @@ static int hardlockup_detector_event_create(void)
evt = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(wd_attr, cpu, NULL,
watchdog_overflow_callback, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(evt)) {
- wd_attr = &fallback_wd_hw_attr;
- wd_attr->sample_period = hw_nmi_get_sample_period(watchdog_thresh);
+ fallback_wd_hw_attr();
evt = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(wd_attr, cpu, NULL,
watchdog_overflow_callback, NULL);
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-27 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-27 3:25 Qing Wong [this message]
2025-08-09 4:07 ` Qing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250727032516.10063-1-wangqing7171@gmail.com \
--to=wangqing7171@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®