From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com (mail-pl1-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AC9D221554 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 18:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.176 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753726902; cv=none; b=NqwqOcCe1ikdlJZGpZ5jMexcZt/udVI67V5wf7ceunWTR79DNKAxizsHs73G1pQi6dwZXtvjHoU+s9t0VeMePxELTozLhe0D2YiNvk1phuQYhERlXtAbmypCKwAl6ZQJpavHBBc0XFmRVQrYJW0vLukIvdRM2WC01xpHyHbO+7g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753726902; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dG9bHeLM1xk//tApPMXIJ61OroVAnIbOewqczIzkC8g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LPBZTt4pzkaaGDIAhqnOhAOwBhzeHiyfhvcNG2gqr9AnV10XFCJrMWGJE7hB38x7F7GHo/PifeOshhe4JM74Bkct5fRCizs6f0tdEW9KlQr6MxQjZyBP6+Km7XnL1WDajdhUUv8bEyn6jU6G6Jlk+m8br5Ouhvl5RDaogllIxRw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=2vvpqoWH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.176 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="2vvpqoWH" Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-237f18108d2so26105ad.0 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:21:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1753726900; x=1754331700; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=U3hmyZvfsTHdwJz4dIDqTvttC6a6u3BEsF8dGiWKG2w=; b=2vvpqoWHblnKEOj90Avdz3B37jWPurYdeg/lZya7Ptkf23uD8B9wXrLUCOn9F4VkPe 8beMMMtFJxSVqwiKo5akZZySU1wt0h+avefCmoRVgZJQV/aoifsdajPGiqtjMjctjgK7 1p67y5w2nhWQdQSlN0Ytu+9DUVQWnURkxSkHZBKtV7nmg0GcF8RASh059DUd6H8pEpAl oSuqeBl3qMN1vZRZeAzr3ZAbVFoX2XcYRyvxU3ZGsNdZWXmLx+NLBVPBiU4OuvLvJHWq z/Bcq6ipwOyH4fHhMFYgkaZgE72mEN+GLlQD/uYcBXfOT39VF7d9gv6zDbjAnqpdNpnV ZVbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753726900; x=1754331700; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=U3hmyZvfsTHdwJz4dIDqTvttC6a6u3BEsF8dGiWKG2w=; b=dDJeIrOlpgaV0nzyj3eCdbl3RDFzWgwBlPJDUkPmnTcSso6oP9q22vhOJybAAKvLTV mn3IKid2Luj91kSKjHi5jGfQCXoVrs5FqtDEE/P9Q12FPrg+I3GKU5lXfGLZyex2T8Zl 9mrijDDA4M2Oh51vKv5jqdpyzkCJDQ14KPK1p8c5VC6UqvQU7Bxfq4nrGmUD84ULAz7K MHKpFsfd+ONTFycgca1+Tuchn9hJifhe7BUCb5r5ocBPO8TgIBxiOowSREtn1QpmkWDO exnyiTcgzkhqEqD2F7aTVZ2sCzKwE06AYCKtAvKvX+9YlkxltJBndyigXcayLjuOf2i4 08GA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVGtrotn+8fGBSvdwUJhAEQtjSSVoevv1nWkpq9E8NdKEK/Tt2ZgiUGFuhdj00gQfhZ30Zzx6feCqlJZzQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzJBZLH9h14TKuTBQtoxl7o/44f4W6NbZhDPdizWKPjpthF98hC c9SsSKz2AdVzogajSf6On4Q7Si0LCjAbd+wyZ8oN7bWoA/ImXad92BnoCuEtOkAfJQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncugTkvEOPnU7+q81Jmv7PCxbXXYS936u7pGGy08APsF/iHqTMeyF/EC0/gilXP SGQCySK5M0Lwoi+7oSu1OG6ca7CISEfWKjj0H0Nf1bm1J6PoUPXuG/Rqr+m/J1kIt2QXJzDwjg9 pc+MFvXAPve2cfcNseA3wUFjIEXzN90B0CEbyfQdzkpMf975S1HIuch0wdGSJu1/sn55YCQXlFA uMyf7ShKcluU83tH1mdAIv2srHX2tdTmaTxmock8byXwqgSCBTFd0Xofy6ajbG1WdCvoT9fmc5h 0q/PW8TiGHK367x2dz5trFfY6JgDDuhJzjZasCCk/AOxJMV+baHzU8PaiIw04HGC9v7PfTA/WfO TJ3DTNvvZD97LO1j3f5KFcBQHs2v98+vBCf+smF9EnGewSZsZMPu/aJhIrv6uzeJLxAMf X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFcpgJb1R5wQYv4TfO2DcoDyNX+OGPn08Wv51Nbvqxg+j9hq2EXJS/j5nO2oSPzqax8ItBhqg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e890:b0:240:3c64:8638 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2406789b433mr308495ad.6.1753726899944; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (111.143.125.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.125.143.111]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-768cf25edecsm1635674b3a.137.2025.07.28.11.21.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 18:21:34 +0000 From: Sami Tolvanen To: Yonghong Song Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types Message-ID: <20250728182134.GB899009@google.com> References: <20250725214401.1475224-6-samitolvanen@google.com> <5d7d1ff3-14cd-4c18-a180-3c99e784bbeb@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d7d1ff3-14cd-4c18-a180-3c99e784bbeb@linux.dev> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 04:42:29PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote: > > With this patch set and no CONFIG_CFI_CLANG in .config, > the bpf selftests work okay. In bpf ci, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG > is not enabled. > > But if enabling CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, this patch set fixed > ./test_progs run issue, but there are some test failures > like > > === > test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000d581 - ffffffffa000d558 > 39 > processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 > #32/186 btf/line_info (No subprog):FAIL > > test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000dee5 - ffffffffa000debc > 39 > processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 > #32/189 btf/line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info:FAIL > > ... > > test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000e069 - ffffffffa000e040 > 38 > processed 9 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 0 > #32/202 btf/line_info (dead subprog + dead start w/ move):FAIL > #32 btf:FAIL > === > > The failure probably not related to this patch, but rather related > to CONFIG_CFI_CLANG itself. I will debug this separately. Agreed, that looks unrelated to this series. Sami