From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the libcrypto tree with the s390 tree
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:05:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250730090540.52bdd52f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250704141635.57ff7b16@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1025 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 14:16:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the libcrypto tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/s390/lib/crypto/sha256.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 65c9a9f92502 ("s390: Explicitly include <linux/export.h>")
>
> from the s390 tree and commit:
>
> 1a8f59dfdca0 ("lib/crypto: sha256: Consolidate into single module")
> b8456f7aaf35 ("lib/crypto: s390: Move arch/s390/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/")
>
> from the libcrypto tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the s390 tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-04 4:16 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-29 23:05 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250730090540.52bdd52f@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®