From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f202.google.com (mail-pf1-f202.google.com [209.85.210.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9400A2D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2025 01:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753925650; cv=none; b=j/Z9xSdlND47L9n2wUCj89LT+VlSqhmEnKfLZ5eFexop76e4EkI1g/HFMi5HhrJRI2zwTngZhkdF6GFLDDah5sfN5Da1p9UoGGN64bOkt0VkVehf7gvLw70xziOfSMsmTBhVca7L8ZU6+q3jN5Ms1n2Vwt9L2jYslJOJ4CeXpMY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753925650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s7XCUPCx0Z8UYBYkol+ZPOuARM+RCvAqLESjL6xoE9M=; h=Date:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=m3nnktN5oXtZKgZ2osnutxT5spRMlvHfFNPZ7rSozt+lQjFp+kiYs8EuWPdKsjMvgtApUFSx3q1NmEJsR1Mv2LpbMAQ4vmUQ5/JBOM2JkCRM1dMIrdi3xvQ93BapRxpNAzcxanGimgPIDSQ+ILQDRT1UjABgghiKgEF6U1wO20U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--surenb.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=faZdHIJT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--surenb.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="faZdHIJT" Received: by mail-pf1-f202.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-76bb326ad0bso440867b3a.0 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1753925648; x=1754530448; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=a+R+pUDhLLfQRqY7ulzy0ZSPAJIfV+A1iE7M1Yu6mNg=; b=faZdHIJTWQIng/oZ56fuuZmjCuNC3BPdRbnrW9SW0HGo6lg24+w3ybl+7ffeJ+h0TL vtVzvxoxuGxdQ/Mi0fSWsAly1cRM7mZDTyJ9dHBT7NCjo/f1fvuLcZurMJm2VhcaSeIW ixxdWTflkQ3BaJNRlS0FPDb5UkkgN2ubA7Sw4HGgrMgTZ33EGnRVbBwpJe17JY9m2AG6 jygTvQilGcjGb/xrhIC1bN6S3zAUzc7tsaNz11vshUfDAExS2WomGVEX1pF6gk5rAncX gJcr/A2TAGAF4TxY1v+ku9Fu4Y26cXpjWrDJbEI6syDpThcLPB/lhYR4HfvlR4JjiZ11 CfBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753925648; x=1754530448; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=a+R+pUDhLLfQRqY7ulzy0ZSPAJIfV+A1iE7M1Yu6mNg=; b=C3s8lmEg0E8/Er5aMnSEspq2nRohOF18Z6dv1FoOD+72fsIJrWJ3LrpQH7BgsCvJ9H rzkWTiEc4Bu8CAcqoVBKRGzGT45W6hrjTdIn+V7ZQKWSOUE5HATisM3WYOsoiYYyzSV+ hWEAsFXWy/oFOhAqAO0MLN4EqJjxSZd7+N8IVMKi8Gj2P/qM0WuSnebT8gCcSbesaVOT mbJQucPik5eozbkZIra6LmpFNKHvXU8Xqn0Rhfs5sAbup3Gk11giDkz7GoBf8oBg+Bol n0VrESbD66lajrzpAcJYh4i1dgp/iXS+HA5jpanfOUaDHGCkhwawTqXZi6Iv7rsW9Bve Vutw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXKtuylLFshllAB8iymzup8/pwb41lMdEEjXyvja1BiKqLWfFtSEK7Dot3FA8lDPdAm9dHGwH2on6fU5N8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzhJCjbvDQfoilf2m/w43RbSrmdxwOIvV+gbC7pFqHfpXxBFjnP VRPtwLe1K4lRhJeDthgIWL/3L4UOgOKunQrCfUZ5/SiLlodEBp+odx7Kfn+6KtX3U5qONMBvuN8 /oaG2MQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFc+GuYPfa9fzIhYQzqHqCTOK+dIE+0wJqbFAFjp2yjLZ6zYOgtHRY8Tjmoc+W0/zRNvdykn1vxr8o= X-Received: from pfbic11.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a00:8a0b:b0:756:c6cf:2462]) (user=surenb job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a00:1586:b0:736:8c0f:7758 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-76ab161aa28mr6861606b3a.10.1753925648164; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:34:03 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.1.552.g942d659e1b-goog Message-ID: <20250731013405.4066346-1-surenb@google.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: limit the scope of vma_start_read() From: Suren Baghdasaryan To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: jannh@google.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, pfalcato@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Limit the scope of vma_start_read() as it is used only as a helper for higher-level locking functions implemented inside mmap_lock.c and we are about to introduce more complex RCU rules for this function. The change is pure code refactoring and has no functional changes. Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan --- include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 85 --------------------------------------- mm/mmap_lock.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mmap_lock.h b/include/linux/mmap_lock.h index 11a078de9150..2c9fffa58714 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmap_lock.h +++ b/include/linux/mmap_lock.h @@ -147,91 +147,6 @@ static inline void vma_refcount_put(struct vm_area_struct *vma) } } -/* - * Try to read-lock a vma. The function is allowed to occasionally yield false - * locked result to avoid performance overhead, in which case we fall back to - * using mmap_lock. The function should never yield false unlocked result. - * False locked result is possible if mm_lock_seq overflows or if vma gets - * reused and attached to a different mm before we lock it. - * Returns the vma on success, NULL on failure to lock and EAGAIN if vma got - * detached. - * - * WARNING! The vma passed to this function cannot be used if the function - * fails to lock it because in certain cases RCU lock is dropped and then - * reacquired. Once RCU lock is dropped the vma can be concurently freed. - */ -static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm, - struct vm_area_struct *vma) -{ - int oldcnt; - - /* - * Check before locking. A race might cause false locked result. - * We can use READ_ONCE() for the mm_lock_seq here, and don't need - * ACQUIRE semantics, because this is just a lockless check whose result - * we don't rely on for anything - the mm_lock_seq read against which we - * need ordering is below. - */ - if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence)) - return NULL; - - /* - * If VMA_LOCK_OFFSET is set, __refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire() - * will fail because VMA_REF_LIMIT is less than VMA_LOCK_OFFSET. - * Acquire fence is required here to avoid reordering against later - * vm_lock_seq check and checks inside lock_vma_under_rcu(). - */ - if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt, - VMA_REF_LIMIT))) { - /* return EAGAIN if vma got detached from under us */ - return oldcnt ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); - } - - rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); - - /* - * If vma got attached to another mm from under us, that mm is not - * stable and can be freed in the narrow window after vma->vm_refcnt - * is dropped and before rcuwait_wake_up(mm) is called. Grab it before - * releasing vma->vm_refcnt. - */ - if (unlikely(vma->vm_mm != mm)) { - /* Use a copy of vm_mm in case vma is freed after we drop vm_refcnt */ - struct mm_struct *other_mm = vma->vm_mm; - - /* - * __mmdrop() is a heavy operation and we don't need RCU - * protection here. Release RCU lock during these operations. - * We reinstate the RCU read lock as the caller expects it to - * be held when this function returns even on error. - */ - rcu_read_unlock(); - mmgrab(other_mm); - vma_refcount_put(vma); - mmdrop(other_mm); - rcu_read_lock(); - return NULL; - } - - /* - * Overflow of vm_lock_seq/mm_lock_seq might produce false locked result. - * False unlocked result is impossible because we modify and check - * vma->vm_lock_seq under vma->vm_refcnt protection and mm->mm_lock_seq - * modification invalidates all existing locks. - * - * We must use ACQUIRE semantics for the mm_lock_seq so that if we are - * racing with vma_end_write_all(), we only start reading from the VMA - * after it has been unlocked. - * This pairs with RELEASE semantics in vma_end_write_all(). - */ - if (unlikely(vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&mm->mm_lock_seq))) { - vma_refcount_put(vma); - return NULL; - } - - return vma; -} - /* * Use only while holding mmap read lock which guarantees that locking will not * fail (nobody can concurrently write-lock the vma). vma_start_read() should diff --git a/mm/mmap_lock.c b/mm/mmap_lock.c index b006cec8e6fe..10826f347a9f 100644 --- a/mm/mmap_lock.c +++ b/mm/mmap_lock.c @@ -127,6 +127,91 @@ void vma_mark_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma) } } +/* + * Try to read-lock a vma. The function is allowed to occasionally yield false + * locked result to avoid performance overhead, in which case we fall back to + * using mmap_lock. The function should never yield false unlocked result. + * False locked result is possible if mm_lock_seq overflows or if vma gets + * reused and attached to a different mm before we lock it. + * Returns the vma on success, NULL on failure to lock and EAGAIN if vma got + * detached. + * + * WARNING! The vma passed to this function cannot be used if the function + * fails to lock it because in certain cases RCU lock is dropped and then + * reacquired. Once RCU lock is dropped the vma can be concurently freed. + */ +static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + int oldcnt; + + /* + * Check before locking. A race might cause false locked result. + * We can use READ_ONCE() for the mm_lock_seq here, and don't need + * ACQUIRE semantics, because this is just a lockless check whose result + * we don't rely on for anything - the mm_lock_seq read against which we + * need ordering is below. + */ + if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence)) + return NULL; + + /* + * If VMA_LOCK_OFFSET is set, __refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire() + * will fail because VMA_REF_LIMIT is less than VMA_LOCK_OFFSET. + * Acquire fence is required here to avoid reordering against later + * vm_lock_seq check and checks inside lock_vma_under_rcu(). + */ + if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt, + VMA_REF_LIMIT))) { + /* return EAGAIN if vma got detached from under us */ + return oldcnt ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); + } + + rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); + + /* + * If vma got attached to another mm from under us, that mm is not + * stable and can be freed in the narrow window after vma->vm_refcnt + * is dropped and before rcuwait_wake_up(mm) is called. Grab it before + * releasing vma->vm_refcnt. + */ + if (unlikely(vma->vm_mm != mm)) { + /* Use a copy of vm_mm in case vma is freed after we drop vm_refcnt */ + struct mm_struct *other_mm = vma->vm_mm; + + /* + * __mmdrop() is a heavy operation and we don't need RCU + * protection here. Release RCU lock during these operations. + * We reinstate the RCU read lock as the caller expects it to + * be held when this function returns even on error. + */ + rcu_read_unlock(); + mmgrab(other_mm); + vma_refcount_put(vma); + mmdrop(other_mm); + rcu_read_lock(); + return NULL; + } + + /* + * Overflow of vm_lock_seq/mm_lock_seq might produce false locked result. + * False unlocked result is impossible because we modify and check + * vma->vm_lock_seq under vma->vm_refcnt protection and mm->mm_lock_seq + * modification invalidates all existing locks. + * + * We must use ACQUIRE semantics for the mm_lock_seq so that if we are + * racing with vma_end_write_all(), we only start reading from the VMA + * after it has been unlocked. + * This pairs with RELEASE semantics in vma_end_write_all(). + */ + if (unlikely(vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&mm->mm_lock_seq))) { + vma_refcount_put(vma); + return NULL; + } + + return vma; +} + /* * Lookup and lock a VMA under RCU protection. Returned VMA is guaranteed to be * stable and not isolated. If the VMA is not found or is being modified the -- 2.50.1.552.g942d659e1b-goog