From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@oracle.com>,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hung_task: Dump blocker task if it is not hung
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:50:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250731065050.38905afadd094ddc0d7a8bcf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c40f5578-7c07-4328-9885-500957a7dcab@linux.dev>
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:46:16 +0800
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/7/30 17:53, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> >
> > Dump the lock blocker task if it is not hung because if the blocker
> > task is also hung, it should be dumped by the detector. This will
> > de-duplicate the same stackdumps if the blocker task is also blocked
> > by another task (and hung).
>
> Makes sense to me ;)
>
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/hung_task.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
> > index d2432df2b905..52d72beb2233 100644
> > --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
> > +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
> > @@ -94,9 +94,49 @@ static struct notifier_block panic_block = {
> > .notifier_call = hung_task_panic,
> > };
> >
> > +static bool task_is_hung(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long switch_count = t->nvcsw + t->nivcsw;
> > + unsigned int state;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks -- these can be killed
> > + * skip the TASK_IDLE tasks -- those are genuinely idle
> > + */
> > + state = READ_ONCE(t->__state);
> > + if (!(state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) ||
> > + (state & TASK_WAKEKILL) ||
> > + (state & TASK_NOLOAD))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure the task is not frozen.
> > + * Also, skip vfork and any other user process that freezer should skip.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->__state) & TASK_FROZEN))
> > + return false;
>
>
> Nit: the two separate checks on t->__state could be combined into
> a single read and one conditional check ;)
>
> Something like:
>
> state = READ_ONCE(t->__state);
>
> if (!(state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) ||
> (state & (TASK_WAKEKILL | TASK_NOLOAD | TASK_FROZEN)))
> return false;
Ah, Indeed.
>
>
> Otherwise, looks good to me:
> Acked-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Thanks, let me update it. (also on the next tree)
Thank you!
>
> Thanks,
> Lance
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * When a freshly created task is scheduled once, changes its state to
> > + * TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE without having ever been switched out once, it
> > + * musn't be checked.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(!switch_count))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (switch_count != t->last_switch_count) {
> > + t->last_switch_count = switch_count;
> > + t->last_switch_time = jiffies;
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + if (time_is_after_jiffies(t->last_switch_time + timeout * HZ))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER
> > -static void debug_show_blocker(struct task_struct *task)
> > +static void debug_show_blocker(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long timeout)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *g, *t;
> > unsigned long owner, blocker, blocker_type;
> > @@ -153,41 +193,21 @@ static void debug_show_blocker(struct task_struct *task)
> > task->comm, task->pid, t->comm, t->pid);
> > break;
> > }
> > - sched_show_task(t);
> > + /* Avoid duplicated task dump, skip if the task is also hung. */
> > + if (!task_is_hung(t, timeout))
> > + sched_show_task(t);
> > return;
> > }
> > }
> > #else
> > -static inline void debug_show_blocker(struct task_struct *task)
> > +static inline void debug_show_blocker(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long timeout)
> > {
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
> > {
> > - unsigned long switch_count = t->nvcsw + t->nivcsw;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Ensure the task is not frozen.
> > - * Also, skip vfork and any other user process that freezer should skip.
> > - */
> > - if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->__state) & TASK_FROZEN))
> > - return;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * When a freshly created task is scheduled once, changes its state to
> > - * TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE without having ever been switched out once, it
> > - * musn't be checked.
> > - */
> > - if (unlikely(!switch_count))
> > - return;
> > -
> > - if (switch_count != t->last_switch_count) {
> > - t->last_switch_count = switch_count;
> > - t->last_switch_time = jiffies;
> > - return;
> > - }
> > - if (time_is_after_jiffies(t->last_switch_time + timeout * HZ))
> > + if (!task_is_hung(t, timeout))
> > return;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -222,7 +242,7 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
> > pr_err("\"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\""
> > " disables this message.\n");
> > sched_show_task(t);
> > - debug_show_blocker(t);
> > + debug_show_blocker(t, timeout);
> > hung_task_show_lock = true;
> >
> > if (sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace)
> > @@ -278,7 +298,6 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
> > hung_task_show_lock = false;
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > for_each_process_thread(g, t) {
> > - unsigned int state;
> >
> > if (!max_count--)
> > goto unlock;
> > @@ -287,15 +306,8 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
> > goto unlock;
> > last_break = jiffies;
> > }
> > - /*
> > - * skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks -- these can be killed
> > - * skip the TASK_IDLE tasks -- those are genuinely idle
> > - */
> > - state = READ_ONCE(t->__state);
> > - if ((state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) &&
> > - !(state & TASK_WAKEKILL) &&
> > - !(state & TASK_NOLOAD))
> > - check_hung_task(t, timeout);
> > +
> > + check_hung_task(t, timeout);
> > }
> > unlock:
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-30 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 7:02 [PATCH v4 0/2] hung_task: Dump the blocking task stacktrace Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-02-25 7:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] hung_task: Show the blocker task if the task is hung on mutex Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-02-26 1:23 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-06 2:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
[not found] ` <5f7bc403-be75-4ae3-b6ff-5ff0673847f9@redhat.com>
2025-03-06 3:10 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-13 3:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-26 1:44 ` Lance Yang
2025-02-26 4:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-26 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-13 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2025-03-14 3:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-30 7:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-07-30 8:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-30 9:36 ` Lance Yang
2025-07-30 10:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-30 10:42 ` Lance Yang
2025-07-30 10:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-07-30 10:40 ` Lance Yang
2025-07-30 9:53 ` [RFC PATCH] hung_task: Dump blocker task if it is not hung Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-07-30 13:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-07-30 13:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-30 13:46 ` Lance Yang
2025-07-30 21:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-07-30 9:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] hung_task: Show the blocker task if the task is hung on mutex Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-07-30 9:22 ` Lance Yang
2025-07-30 9:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-25 7:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] samples: Add hung_task detector mutex blocking sample Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-02-26 1:50 ` Lance Yang
2025-02-26 7:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-26 11:58 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250731065050.38905afadd094ddc0d7a8bcf@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anna.schumaker@oracle.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=leonylgao@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®