mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
	"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/16] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:53:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801125350.9905B20-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710163522.3195293-12-jremus@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 06:35:17PM +0200, Jens Remus wrote:
> Add s390 support for unwinding of user space using SFrame.  This
> leverages the previous commits to address the following s390
> particularities:
> 
> - The CFA is defined as the value of the stack pointer (SP) at call
>   site in the previous frame + 160.  Therefore the SP unwinds as
>   SP = CFA - 160.  Therefore use a SP value offset from CFA of -160.
> 
> - The return address (RA) is not saved on the stack at function entry.
>   It is also not saved in the function prologue, when in leaf functions.
>   Therefore the RA does not necessarily need to be unwound in the first
>   unwinding step for the topmost frame.
> 
> - The frame pointer (FP) and/or return address (RA) may be saved in
>   other registers when in leaf functions.  GCC effectively uses
>   floating-point registers (FPR) for this purpose.  Therefore DWARF
>   register numbers may be encoded in the SFrame FP/RA offsets.

...

> +static inline void __s390_get_dwarf_fpr(unsigned long *val, int regnum)
> +{
> +	switch (regnum) {
> +	case 16:
> +		fpu_std(0, (freg_t *)val);
> +		break;

...

> +static inline int s390_unwind_user_get_reg(unsigned long *val, int regnum)
> +{
> +	if (0 <= regnum && regnum <= 15) {
> +		struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> +		*val = regs->gprs[regnum];
> +	} else if (16 <= regnum && regnum <= 31) {
> +		__s390_get_dwarf_fpr(val, regnum);

This won't work with other potential in-kernel fpu users. User space fpr
contents may have been written to the current task's fpu save area and fprs
may have been clobbered by in-kernel users; so you need to get register
contents from the correct location. See arch/s390/include/asm/fpu.h.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-01 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10 16:35 [RFC PATCH v1 00/16] s390: SFrame user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/16] fixup! unwind_user: Add frame pointer support Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/16] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/16] s390/vdso: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-vDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/16] s390/vdso: Enable SFrame generation in vDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/16] s390/vdso: Keep function symbols " Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2025-07-16 21:32   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17  9:27     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  4:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that do not necessarily save RA Jens Remus
2025-07-16 23:01   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 11:09     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  8:28       ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 16:59         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-21 14:25           ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that save RA/FP in other registers Jens Remus
2025-07-17  2:01   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17  2:50     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:07       ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  4:52         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17  3:57     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-17  7:24       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-17 11:28     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-17 12:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-18  4:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/16] unwind_user/sframe: Enable archs with encoded SFrame CFA offsets Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/16] s390/ptrace: Enable HAVE_USER_RA_REG Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/16] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus
2025-08-01 12:53   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-08-01 15:46     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/16] unwind_user/backchain: Introduce back chain user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-07-17  2:06   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:20     ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18  5:19       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-08-01 12:36         ` Heiko Carstens
2025-08-01 15:49           ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/16] s390/unwind_user/backchain: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_BACKCHAIN Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/16] PREREQ: x86/asm: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/16] PREREQ: x86/vdso: Enable sframe generation in VDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/16] WIP: fixup! s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250801125350.9905B20-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
    --cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®