From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/16] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:53:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801125350.9905B20-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710163522.3195293-12-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 06:35:17PM +0200, Jens Remus wrote:
> Add s390 support for unwinding of user space using SFrame. This
> leverages the previous commits to address the following s390
> particularities:
>
> - The CFA is defined as the value of the stack pointer (SP) at call
> site in the previous frame + 160. Therefore the SP unwinds as
> SP = CFA - 160. Therefore use a SP value offset from CFA of -160.
>
> - The return address (RA) is not saved on the stack at function entry.
> It is also not saved in the function prologue, when in leaf functions.
> Therefore the RA does not necessarily need to be unwound in the first
> unwinding step for the topmost frame.
>
> - The frame pointer (FP) and/or return address (RA) may be saved in
> other registers when in leaf functions. GCC effectively uses
> floating-point registers (FPR) for this purpose. Therefore DWARF
> register numbers may be encoded in the SFrame FP/RA offsets.
...
> +static inline void __s390_get_dwarf_fpr(unsigned long *val, int regnum)
> +{
> + switch (regnum) {
> + case 16:
> + fpu_std(0, (freg_t *)val);
> + break;
...
> +static inline int s390_unwind_user_get_reg(unsigned long *val, int regnum)
> +{
> + if (0 <= regnum && regnum <= 15) {
> + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> + *val = regs->gprs[regnum];
> + } else if (16 <= regnum && regnum <= 31) {
> + __s390_get_dwarf_fpr(val, regnum);
This won't work with other potential in-kernel fpu users. User space fpr
contents may have been written to the current task's fpu save area and fprs
may have been clobbered by in-kernel users; so you need to get register
contents from the correct location. See arch/s390/include/asm/fpu.h.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 16:35 [RFC PATCH v1 00/16] s390: SFrame user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/16] fixup! unwind_user: Add frame pointer support Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/16] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/16] s390/vdso: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-vDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/16] s390/vdso: Enable SFrame generation in vDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/16] s390/vdso: Keep function symbols " Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2025-07-16 21:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 9:27 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 4:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that do not necessarily save RA Jens Remus
2025-07-16 23:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 11:09 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 8:28 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 16:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-21 14:25 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/16] unwind_user: Enable archs that save RA/FP in other registers Jens Remus
2025-07-17 2:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 2:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:07 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 4:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 3:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-17 7:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-17 11:28 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-17 12:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-18 4:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/16] unwind_user/sframe: Enable archs with encoded SFrame CFA offsets Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/16] s390/ptrace: Enable HAVE_USER_RA_REG Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/16] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus
2025-08-01 12:53 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-08-01 15:46 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/16] unwind_user/backchain: Introduce back chain user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-07-17 2:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-17 12:20 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-18 5:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-08-01 12:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-08-01 15:49 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/16] s390/unwind_user/backchain: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_BACKCHAIN Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/16] PREREQ: x86/asm: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/16] PREREQ: x86/vdso: Enable sframe generation in VDSO Jens Remus
2025-07-10 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/16] WIP: fixup! s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250801125350.9905B20-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®