From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0781DD9AC; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754315585; cv=none; b=iJfY8bdWhOdvbCdj5lqdyt4Ru42/l1BxbI5j9qk4m1EAm77ico97zFuoAEHidXgNpgIGw2je7F77HERiiqs4lYtR14gXXDymy66bzg441n00qvNJQg1emA8ifKRJMhwLtHFbjBCaqwlekvSOmq+c2VZTLRbospsn+Qguj9J8ARU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754315585; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5rc6chq3h2xmwl7+CIBxfykl13rJlNajYi69c8oWQf8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HaDHxzxa62o5CjaG+xCM9wq8qAbaAYPQh4etX84ooUDy7ZHJYm0kZriXKJ0yOXxxRhb1S/B4d22bPx9jXFTwZ5NhA7up+npRZTss/ARybDf9ynRLzYtV8nfT4V4rAtsdNmqDBWBZQjr+Bbs9/eC4UuiY4GXEpJ9E6hYkA9g/BYc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pZsqodiv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pZsqodiv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C793C4CEE7; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:53:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754315585; bh=5rc6chq3h2xmwl7+CIBxfykl13rJlNajYi69c8oWQf8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pZsqodivm+P4sALfbGHhv+MPQEBsR1hk8+XFGlspkAXYyQ/dxJ08h9OG5w1fYmy61 1seqaQMHVVEIwEPLoopGPeIP2v7gWH9Hz6w4/NnagGerYa81JNT0nH/qSS+mLpef0F NjWH/uW4eWOpZuJYu7RQ5eLz/M41QFcN5YbPI0YDyiplXZ0Aody6HagKCUsbEJsKdf BggRkcRSRDnpnOs9Zuj4PIUl5iPqVRDsyxsfOcsj8YCwnlBtfto6l87b9kRAKgrG/c tf/EWKz1g7u1hgNING7W6MR+8jtwsvfZ7zb/dH7F56MNHcVnhST3zeQa+hW82y//YK V3nZLY/9JfntA== Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 15:53:01 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Beibei Yang <13738176232@163.com> Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] init: Fix comment typo in do_mounts_initrd.c Message-ID: <20250804-raben-einwickeln-b778686442a7@brauner> References: <1754231358-3544-1-git-send-email-13738176232@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1754231358-3544-1-git-send-email-13738176232@163.com> On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 07:29:18AM -0700, Beibei Yang wrote: > From: root > > The original comment incorrectly used "cwd" (current working directory) > when referring to the root change operation. The correct term should be > "pwd" (present working directory) as per process context semantics. > > This is a pure comment correction with no functional impact. > > Signed-off-by: Beibei Yang <13738176232@163.com> > --- Didn't I reply to the same thing just a few weeks ago? Not worth it imho. cwd is equally well understood as pwd.