[PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: s390: Fix FOLL_*/FAULT_FLAG_* confusion

[Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>]

Pass the right type of flag to vcpu_dat_fault_handler(); it expects a
FOLL_* flag (in particular FOLL_WRITE), but FAULT_FLAG_WRITE is passed
instead.

This still works because they happen to have the same integer value,
but it's a mistake, thus the fix.

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 05066cafa925 ("s390/mm/fault: Handle guest-related program interrupts in KVM")
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index d5ad10791c25..d41d77f2c7cd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4954,13 +4954,13 @@ static int vcpu_dat_fault_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gaddr, un
 
 static int vcpu_post_run_handle_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	unsigned int flags = 0;
+	unsigned int foll = 0;
 	unsigned long gaddr;
 	int rc;
 
 	gaddr = current->thread.gmap_teid.addr * PAGE_SIZE;
 	if (kvm_s390_cur_gmap_fault_is_write())
-		flags = FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
+		foll = FOLL_WRITE;
 
 	switch (current->thread.gmap_int_code & PGM_INT_CODE_MASK) {
 	case 0:
@@ -5002,7 +5002,7 @@ static int vcpu_post_run_handle_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
 		if (rc != -ENXIO)
 			break;
-		flags = FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
+		foll = FOLL_WRITE;
 		fallthrough;
 	case PGM_PROTECTION:
 	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
@@ -5012,7 +5012,7 @@ static int vcpu_post_run_handle_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case PGM_REGION_SECOND_TRANS:
 	case PGM_REGION_THIRD_TRANS:
 		kvm_s390_assert_primary_as(vcpu);
-		return vcpu_dat_fault_handler(vcpu, gaddr, flags);
+		return vcpu_dat_fault_handler(vcpu, gaddr, foll);
 	default:
 		KVM_BUG(1, vcpu->kvm, "Unexpected program interrupt 0x%x, TEID 0x%016lx",
 			current->thread.gmap_int_code, current->thread.gmap_teid.val);
-- 
2.50.1