mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
To: rmoar@google.com, davidgow@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	 brendan.higgins@linux.dev
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, elver@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
	 lucas.demarchi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
	 rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	 intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 22:17:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250811221739.2694336-4-marievic@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811221739.2694336-1-marievic@google.com>

To enable more complex parameterized testing scenarios,
the generate_params() function needs additional context
beyond just the previously generated parameter. This patch
modifies the generate_params() function signature to
include an extra `struct kunit *test` argument, giving
test users access to the parameterized test context when
generating parameters.

The `struct kunit *test` argument was added as the first parameter
to the function signature as it aligns with the convention
of other KUnit functions that accept `struct kunit *test` first.
This also mirrors the "this" or "self" reference found
in object-oriented programming languages.

This patch also modifies xe_pci_live_device_gen_param()
in xe_pci.c and nthreads_gen_params() in kcsan_test.c
to reflect this signature change.

Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
---

Changes in v2:

- generate_params signature changes in
  xe_pci.c and kcsan_test.c were squashed
  into a single patch to avoid in-between
  breakages in the series.
- The comments and the commit message were changed to
  reflect the parameterized testing terminology. See
  the patch series cover letter change log for the
  definitions.

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c | 2 +-
 include/kunit/test.h              | 9 ++++++---
 kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c         | 2 +-
 lib/kunit/test.c                  | 5 +++--
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
index 1d3e2e50c355..62c016e84227 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_fake_device_init);
  * Return: pointer to the next &struct xe_device ready to be used as a parameter
  *         or NULL if there are no more Xe devices on the system.
  */
-const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
+const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
 {
 	const struct xe_device *xe = prev;
 	struct device *dev = xe ? xe->drm.dev : NULL;
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index d2e1b986b161..b527189d2d1c 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ struct kunit_attributes {
 struct kunit_case {
 	void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test);
 	const char *name;
-	const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc);
+	const void* (*generate_params)(struct kunit *test,
+				       const void *prev, char *desc);
 	struct kunit_attributes attr;
 	int (*param_init)(struct kunit *test);
 	void (*param_exit)(struct kunit *test);
@@ -1691,7 +1692,8 @@ do {									       \
  * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters.
  */
 #define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(name, array, get_desc)						\
-	static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)			\
+	static const void *name##_gen_params(struct kunit *test,				\
+					     const void *prev, char *desc)			\
 	{											\
 		typeof((array)[0]) *__next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array);	\
 		if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) {					\
@@ -1712,7 +1714,8 @@ do {									       \
  * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters.
  */
 #define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(name, array, desc_member)					\
-	static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)			\
+	static const void *name##_gen_params(struct kunit *test,				\
+					     const void *prev, char *desc)			\
 	{											\
 		typeof((array)[0]) *__next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array);	\
 		if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) {					\
diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
index c2871180edcc..fc76648525ac 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
@@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static void test_atomic_builtins_missing_barrier(struct kunit *test)
  * The thread counts are chosen to cover potentially interesting boundaries and
  * corner cases (2 to 5), and then stress the system with larger counts.
  */
-static const void *nthreads_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)
+static const void *nthreads_gen_params(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
 {
 	long nthreads = (long)prev;
 
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 49a5e6c30c86..01b20702a5a2 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 			/* Get initial param. */
 			param_desc[0] = '\0';
 			/* TODO: Make generate_params try-catch */
-			curr_param = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
+			curr_param = test_case->generate_params(&test, NULL, param_desc);
 			test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
 			kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
 				  "KTAP version 1\n");
@@ -726,7 +726,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 
 				/* Get next param. */
 				param_desc[0] = '\0';
-				curr_param = test_case->generate_params(curr_param, param_desc);
+				curr_param = test_case->generate_params(&test, curr_param,
+									param_desc);
 			}
 			/*
 			 * TODO: Put into a try catch. Since we don't need suite->exit
-- 
2.51.0.rc0.205.g4a044479a3-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-11 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 22:17 [PATCH v2 0/7] kunit: Refactor and extend KUnit's parameterized testing framework Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] kunit: Add parent kunit for parameterized test context Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] kunit: Introduce param_init/exit for parameterized test context management Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` Marie Zhussupova [this message]
2025-08-12 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params() Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-12 22:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  7:43   ` Marco Elver
2025-08-13  9:18   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] kunit: Add example parameterized test with shared resource management using the Resource API Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] kunit: Add example parameterized test with direct dynamic parameter array setup Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:18   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] Documentation: kunit: Document new parameterized test features Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:18   ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250811221739.2694336-4-marievic@google.com \
    --to=marievic@google.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®