From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 399AB305E3D; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755014033; cv=none; b=spLygUvNLU+/y6At2EX1SIFDwDk42zoaomPJrfBdqhozTo77jQglAK6KV5Btxbw10pl5JayfTBkiEQIdNLb4WGxn0DjlcVsIYBdg0wDQIsWVf5rzGtCjp7UgfY6xOuW9J7MzkL3FrMc8tAbbr3vLU6OWxJa13llOSUgu3z5V6z4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755014033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BBheX8sbWCgYegYhKcL7467b7LoL9F8LRRRwdBxBPuo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZSx4VbEIwDpTul6y/VnQ5dYv20zxFVLHly/2cisuCDICQQ0fpbHfVXbHIBKQuMy1bi00+KkY1lNOPxcOSUS4+ZKXZC0XLCmq1fU3Hnx4YnFCtyXB1gZHYcFTOmN6fU0dR5NUi8/lLMSjTHtw9ABMEqxwuf2dOyUAIbfy0MvUJ98= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4c1bbV6Zzlz6M4bb; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 23:51:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5929F1401DC; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 23:53:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:53:46 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:53:45 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Primoz Fiser CC: Haibo Chen , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , Fabio Estevam , , , , , "upstream@lists.phytec.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: imx93_adc: load calibrated values even calibration failed Message-ID: <20250812165345.000002a4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20250812-adc-v2-0-0260833f13b8@nxp.com> <20250812-adc-v2-2-0260833f13b8@nxp.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.183) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:45:48 +0200 Primoz Fiser wrote: > Hi Haibo, > > On 12. 08. 25 10:04, Haibo Chen wrote: > > ADC calibration might fail because of the noise on reference voltage. > > To avoid calibration fail, need to meet the following requirement: > > ADC reference voltage Noise < 1.8V * 1/2^ENOB > > > > For the case which the ADC reference voltage on board do not meet > > the requirement, still load the calibrated values, so ADC can also > > work but maybe not that accurate. > > Reviewed-by: Primoz Fiser > > Thanks for fixing this. > > BR, > Primoz > > > > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen > > --- > > drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c > > index 8471737ac04a2bac0417a6397f20865f6a2c01ca..17b0a2548b0a3614ac537b01e28bc3144d17d6fc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ > > #define IMX93_ADC_PCDR6 0x118 > > #define IMX93_ADC_PCDR7 0x11C > > #define IMX93_ADC_CALSTAT 0x39C > > +#define IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0 0x3A0 > > > > /* ADC bit shift */ > > #define IMX93_ADC_MCR_MODE_MASK BIT(29) > > @@ -58,6 +59,8 @@ > > #define IMX93_ADC_IMR_ECH_MASK BIT(0) > > #define IMX93_ADC_PCDR_CDATA_MASK GENMASK(11, 0) > > > > +#define IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0_LDFAIL_MASK BIT(4) > > + > > /* ADC status */ > > #define IMX93_ADC_MSR_ADCSTATUS_IDLE 0 > > #define IMX93_ADC_MSR_ADCSTATUS_POWER_DOWN 1 > > @@ -145,7 +148,7 @@ static void imx93_adc_config_ad_clk(struct imx93_adc *adc) > > > > static int imx93_adc_calibration(struct imx93_adc *adc) > > { > > - u32 mcr, msr; > > + u32 mcr, msr, calcfg; > > int ret; > > > > /* make sure ADC in power down mode */ > > @@ -158,6 +161,11 @@ static int imx93_adc_calibration(struct imx93_adc *adc) > > > > imx93_adc_power_up(adc); > > > > + /* Enable loading of calibrated values even in fail condition */ > > + calcfg = readl(adc->regs + IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0); > > + calcfg |= IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0_LDFAIL_MASK; > > + writel(calcfg, adc->regs + IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0); > > + > > /* > > * TODO: we use the default TSAMP/NRSMPL/AVGEN in MCR, > > * can add the setting of these bit if need in future. > > @@ -180,9 +188,13 @@ static int imx93_adc_calibration(struct imx93_adc *adc) > > /* check whether calbration is success or not */ > > msr = readl(adc->regs + IMX93_ADC_MSR); > > if (msr & IMX93_ADC_MSR_CALFAIL_MASK) { > > + /* > > + * Only give warning here, this means the noise of the > > + * reference voltage do not meet the requirement: > > + * ADC reference voltage Noise < 1.8V * 1/2^ENOB > > + * And the resault of ADC is not that accurate. result If nothing else comes up I'll probably just fix that whilst applying. Jonathan > > + */ > > dev_warn(adc->dev, "ADC calibration failed!\n"); > > - imx93_adc_power_down(adc); > > - return -EAGAIN; > > } > > > > return 0; > > >