From: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com>
To: <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <enjuk@amazon.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <kohei.enju@gmail.com>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 17:47:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250813084815.85188-1-enjuk@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b44df93-acec-4416-9f32-f97d0bfaaa7b@molgen.mpg.de>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:18:29 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Kohei,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Am 13.08.25 um 09:50 schrieb Kohei Enju:
> > Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX
> > Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side equivalents
> > (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those missing
> > statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics.
> >
> > In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not consistent
> > with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes). Therefore, align
> > the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets.
> >
> > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection.
> >
> > Before:
> > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)"
> > rx_packets: 135
> > tx_packets: 106
> > rx_bytes: 16010
> > tx_bytes: 12451
> > lbrx_bytes: 1148
> > lbrx_packets: 12
> >
> > After:
> > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)"
> > rx_packets: 748
> > tx_packets: 304
> > rx_bytes: 81513
> > tx_bytes: 33698
> > lbrx_packets: 97
> > lbtx_packets: 109
> > lbrx_bytes: 12090
> > lbtx_bytes: 12401
> >
> > Tested-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com>
>
> No need to resend, but I believe, you only add a Tested-by: tag, if the
> person differs from the author/Signed-off-by: tag.
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you for the feedback.
Since I want to resend the other patch[1] after updating as you pointed
out, I'll resend this series as v2 including this patch without the
Tested-by: tag.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20250813075206.70114-3-enjuk@amazon.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
> > index 773895c663fd..c6defc495f13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
> > @@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = {
> > { "rx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) },
> > { "tx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotc, stats.base_gotc) },
> > { "multicast", IGBVF_STAT(stats.mprc, stats.base_mprc) },
> > - { "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) },
> > { "lbrx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gprlbc, stats.base_gprlbc) },
> > + { "lbtx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gptlbc, stats.base_gptlbc) },
> > + { "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) },
> > + { "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) },
> > { "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) },
> > { "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) },
> > { "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) },
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
Thank you for reviewing!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 7:50 [PATCH v1 iwl-next 0/2] igbvf: ethtool statistics improvements Kohei Enju
2025-08-13 7:50 ` [PATCH v1 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics Kohei Enju
2025-08-13 8:18 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2025-08-13 8:47 ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2025-08-26 15:51 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-28 10:16 ` Romanowski, Rafal
2025-08-13 7:50 ` [PATCH v1 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove duplicated counter rx_long_byte_count from " Kohei Enju
2025-08-13 8:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2025-08-13 8:54 ` Kohei Enju
2025-08-26 15:52 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250813084815.85188-1-enjuk@amazon.com \
--to=enjuk@amazon.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kohei.enju@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®