From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PF_USER_WORKERs and shadow stack
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:28:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250813162824.GA15234@redhat.com> (raw)
I know nothing about the shadow stacks, perhaps I missed something obvious.
But it seems that if a features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK) thread creates a
PF_USER_WORKER thread, shstk_alloc_thread_stack() will allocate the shadow
stack for no reason.
Don't we need something like the "patch" below? PF_USER_WORKERs never return
to userspace. Note also that update_fpu_shstk() won't be called in this case.
Oleg.
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -209,9 +209,15 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
* is disabled, new_ssp will remain 0, and fpu_clone() will know not to
* update it.
*/
- new_ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, clone_flags, args->stack_size);
- if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_ssp))
- return PTR_ERR((void *)new_ssp);
+ if (args->fn) {
+ new_ssp = 0;
+ // clear p->thread -> shstk/features,
+ // reset_thread_features() won't work
+ } else {
+ new_ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, clone_flags, args->stack_size);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_ssp))
+ return PTR_ERR((void *)new_ssp);
+ }
fpu_clone(p, clone_flags, args->fn, new_ssp);
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 16:28 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-08-13 16:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-13 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-08-13 19:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-08-13 19:21 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-14 10:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250813162824.GA15234@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®