From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com (out-188.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F19D1487F4 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755134144; cv=none; b=jWL9SlaG/6piuJPJWyuMEyJ5gp8uwhNolTKxi4MXP9LvBBUjQcH/9RpNoYhkAZI7X72KJ8tOoA9pPhCxZk6fssUuy/xZ8fYvEE26S6vcPhNEGwMBLSacyi0tjR4jqNUAKx7LmP5syXXWvVkJquxQJtovhG/bBWMFf8Pgf3PYSlA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755134144; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d5BLvqLX09urzN2uAU0YVQ0bDClV0GcGpl2S5bSzuvI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KCN5k8ipqoYQFdprbajvr6bXtooOeTJMNJD0nerdEFLsIsHBGQwfnn59qxKcn98jLZT4JgcLGTJOnjiJN/V+vmCXWq0F5KaaX6ah2agVC59uyK6P/Kd1thykggqYXRgr4yfwq0u4ASJ/9NgPhed7tjX2QQ5WoB4YTTJs2xswvnE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=c/72uRa8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="c/72uRa8" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1755134140; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pSvSvM4+2zysM7Te3VGN2ddfsfP4tfKOXYOL21jw4Tk=; b=c/72uRa8U+SGtBAIzpSF+4uvT4rWbTWt7uyNK9ugtT8L8Ly4eYXOq0D5JQ+laqSPW8rNhc 6HpqT+lTfXdGQ/vYWPAqO0ggScHvkGNlph1zVAYvrTHSYKf3OqilkEJnvCESTrRT7qOPaV Gf4gjW2PzmRyjJLUzQ2vysAw+X0YtQo= From: Yuntao Wang To: brauner@kernel.org Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, yuntao.wang@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix incorrect lflags value in the move_mount syscall Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 09:14:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20250814011459.270835-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20250811-zitat-diebe-3acc89b8c971@brauner> References: <20250811-zitat-diebe-3acc89b8c971@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:06:59 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:24:26 +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote: > > The lflags value used to look up from_path was overwritten by the one used > > to look up to_path. > > > > In other words, from_path was looked up with the wrong lflags value. Fix it. > > > > > > Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. > Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon. > > Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a > new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it. > > It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the > patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated. > > Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase, > trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch. > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git > branch: vfs.fixes > > [1/1] fs: fix incorrect lflags value in the move_mount syscall > https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/593d9e4c3d63 Hi Christian, It seems the patch hasn't been applied to the vfs.fixes branch, the relevant code there appears unchanged. Thanks, Yuntao