mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: conf: Support assigned-clock-sscs
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:50:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250815071249.GA20726@nxa18884-linux.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJwnH2mlRdqp1K1u@stanley.mountain>

Hi Dan,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:48:15AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 08:17:06PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Parse the Spread Spectrum Configuration(SSC) from device tree and configure
>> them before using the clock.
>> 
>> Each SSC is three u32 elements which means '<modfreq spreaddepth
>> modmethod>', so assigned-clock-sscs is an array of multiple three u32
>> elements.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-conf.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c b/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c
>> index 303a0bb26e54a95655ce094a35b989c97ebc6fd8..81a2c1f8ca4c44df2c54c1e51f800f533c9453b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-conf.c
>> @@ -155,6 +155,72 @@ static int __set_clk_rates(struct device_node *node, bool clk_supplier)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int __set_clk_spread_spectrum(struct device_node *node, bool clk_supplier)
>> +{
>> +	u32 *sscs __free(kfree) = NULL;
>> +	u32 elem_size = sizeof(u32) * 3;
>> +	struct of_phandle_args clkspec;
>> +	int rc, count, index;
>> +	struct clk *clk;
>> +
>> +	/* modfreq, spreadPercent, modmethod */
>> +	count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, "assigned-clock-sscs", elem_size);
>> +	if (count > 0) {
>> +		sscs = kcalloc(count, elem_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!sscs)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +		rc = of_property_read_u32_array(node,
>> +						"assigned-clock-sscs",
>> +						sscs, count * 3);
>> +	} else {
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (rc)
>> +		return rc;
>
>Nit pick: Please, flip these conditions around.

ok. Fix in next version.

>
>	count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(node, "assigned-clock-sscs", elem_size);
>	if (count <= 0)
>		return 0;
>
>	sscs = kcalloc(count, elem_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>	if (!sscs)
>		return -ENOMEM;
>
>	rc = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "assigned-clock-sscs", sscs,
>					count * 3);
>	if (rc)
>		return rc;
>
>> +
>> +	for (index = 0; index < count; index++) {
>> +		u32 modfreq_hz = sscs[index * 3], spread_bp = sscs[index * 3 + 1];
>> +		u32 method = sscs[index * 3 + 2];
>
>This math would be nicer if you created a struct:
>
>struct spread_config {
>	u32 modfreq_hz;
>	u32 spread_depth;
>	u32 method;
>};
>
>Then you could use that instead of sscs.
>
>	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>		struct spread_config *conf = &configs[i];
>		struct clk_hw *hw;
>
>		if (!conf->modfreq_hz && !conf->spread_depth && !conf->method)
>			continue;

Thanks for the tips. Update in next version.

>
>> +		struct clk_hw *hw;
>> +
>> +		if (modfreq_hz || spread_bp || method) {
>> +			rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, "assigned-clocks",
>> +					"#clock-cells",	index, &clkspec);
>> +			if (rc < 0) {
>> +				/* skip empty (null) phandles */
>> +				if (rc == -ENOENT)
>> +					continue;
>> +				else
>> +					return rc;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (clkspec.np == node && !clk_supplier) {
>
>Could you add a comment for this condition?  It's strange to me that we
>don't iterate through the whole array.

I just follow the logic in __set_clk_parents and __set_clk_rates, nothing
special here.

It is just like to phase out cases as below:
  node-x {
	/* node-x is not a clk provider, but assigned-clocks uses node-x phandle */
	assigned-clocks = <&node-x   XYZ>;
  }

Thanks for reviewing the patch. I will wait to collect more comments before
posting next version.

Regards,
Peng

>
>regards,
>dan carpenter
>
>> +				of_node_put(clkspec.np);
>> +				return 0;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			clk = of_clk_get_from_provider(&clkspec);
>> +			of_node_put(clkspec.np);
>> +			if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> +				if (PTR_ERR(clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +					pr_warn("clk: couldn't get clock %d for %pOF\n",
>> +						index, node);
>> +				return PTR_ERR(clk);
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
>> +			rc = clk_hw_set_spread_spectrum(hw, modfreq_hz, spread_bp, method);
>> +			if (rc < 0)
>> +				pr_err("clk: couldn't set %s clk spread spectrum %u %u %u: %d\n",
>> +				       __clk_get_name(clk), modfreq_hz, spread_bp, method, rc);
>> +			clk_put(clk);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-15  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-12 12:17 [PATCH 0/3] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk-scmi Peng Fan
2025-08-12 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: Introduce clk_hw_set_spread_spectrum Peng Fan
2025-08-27 15:45   ` Brian Masney
2025-08-29  9:08     ` Peng Fan
2025-08-12 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: conf: Support assigned-clock-sscs Peng Fan
2025-08-13  5:48   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-15  8:50     ` Peng Fan [this message]
2025-08-15  7:51       ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-12 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: scmi: Support Spread Spectrum for NXP i.MX95 Peng Fan
2025-08-27  7:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk-scmi Peng Fan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-24 14:25 Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-01-24 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: conf: Support assigned-clock-sscs Peng Fan (OSS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250815071249.GA20726@nxa18884-linux.ap.freescale.net \
    --to=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®