From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yunseong Kim <ysk@kzalloc.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf: Avoid undefined behavior from stopping/starting inactive events
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 12:56:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250815105605.GA3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <922f69f6-e290-46f6-af6f-5a71e4508cf0@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 04:51:28PM -0700, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 2025-08-12 11:10 a.m., Yunseong Kim wrote:
> > Calling pmu->start()/stop() on perf events in PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF can
> > leave event->hw.idx at -1. When PMU drivers later attempt to use this
> > negative index as a shift exponent in bitwise operations, it leads to UBSAN
> > shift-out-of-bounds reports.
> >
> > The issue is a logical flaw in how event groups handle throttling when some
> > members are intentionally disabled. Based on the analysis and the
> > reproducer provided by Mark Rutland (this issue on both arm64 and x86-64).
> >
> > The scenario unfolds as follows:
> >
> > 1. A group leader event is configured with a very aggressive sampling
> > period (e.g., sample_period = 1). This causes frequent interrupts and
> > triggers the throttling mechanism.
> > 2. A child event in the same group is created in a disabled state
> > (.disabled = 1). This event remains in PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF.
> > Since it hasn't been scheduled onto the PMU, its event->hw.idx remains
> > initialized at -1.
> > 3. When throttling occurs, perf_event_throttle_group() and later
> > perf_event_unthrottle_group() iterate through all siblings, including
> > the disabled child event.
> > 4. perf_event_throttle()/unthrottle() are called on this inactive child
> > event, which then call event->pmu->start()/stop().
> > 5. The PMU driver receives the event with hw.idx == -1 and attempts to
> > use it as a shift exponent. e.g., in macros like PMCNTENSET(idx),
> > leading to the UBSAN report.
> >
> > The throttling mechanism attempts to start/stop events that are not
> > actively scheduled on the hardware.
> >
> > Move the state check into perf_event_throttle()/perf_event_unthrottle() so
> > that inactive events are skipped entirely. This ensures only active events
> > with a valid hw.idx are processed, preventing undefined behavior and
> > silencing UBSAN warnings. The corrected check ensures true before
> > proceeding with PMU operations.
> >
> > The problem can be reproduced with the syzkaller reproducer:
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/714b7ba2-693e-42e4-bce4-feef2a5e7613@kzalloc.com/
> >
> > Fixes: 9734e25fbf5a ("perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group")
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yunseong Kim <ysk@kzalloc.com>
>
> Thanks for the fix.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks both!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-12 18:10 Yunseong Kim
2025-08-12 23:51 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-15 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-08-18 10:23 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Yunseong Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250815105605.GA3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=austindh.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=ysk@kzalloc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®