On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:36:50 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Wut? This doesn't make sense, you have supplies so they should be
> documented. The fact that they're shared with a bunch of other things on
> the SBC you're aiming the product at doesn't matter. What if someone
> doesn't use this sensor with an RPi and there is a dedicated regulator?

The supply was introduced in the second patch version but later removed
following feedback from another maintainer. I’m fine with adding it back
if needed - I just want to make sure we’re consistent.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/c1b848b9-b1da-4976-9838-d474394a0992@kernel.org/

Would you prefer it described as before?

> Is that actually your email address?

will change to a named one

> Don't mention drivers in bindings, how linux handles things is not
relevant to a hardware description.

will remove driver mention