From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
colinmitchell@google.com, chao.gao@intel.com, abusse@amazon.de,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4a 4/6] x86/microcode/intel: Implement staging handler
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:39:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250822223956.12540-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002f259d-2f20-4428-add3-a02650bc728b@intel.com>
Previously, per-package staging invocations and their associated state
data were established. The next step is to implement the actual staging
handler according to the specified protocol. Below are key aspects to
note:
(a) Each staging process must begin by resetting the staging hardware.
(b) The staging hardware processes up to a page-sized chunk of the
microcode image per iteration, requiring software to submit data
incrementally.
(c) Once a data chunk is processed, the hardware responds with an
offset in the image for the next chunk.
(d) The offset may indicate completion or request retransmission of an
already transferred chunk. As long as the total transferred data
remains within the predefined limit (twice the image size),
retransmissions should be acceptable.
With that, incorporate these code sequences to the staging handler:
1. Initialization: Map the MMIO space via ioremap(). Reset the staging
hardware and initialize software state, ensuring a fresh staging
process aligned with (a).
2. Processing Loop: Introduce a loop iterating over data chunk,
following (b), with proper termination conditions established from
(d) -- stop staging when the hardware signals completion, or if the
total transmitted data exceeds the predefined limit.
3. Loop Body: Finally, compose the loop body with two steps --
transmitting a data chunk and retrieving the next offset from the
hardware response, aligning with (b) and (c).
Since data transmission and mailbox format handling require additional
details, they are implemented separately in next changes.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Tested-by: Anselm Busse <abusse@amazon.de>
---
V4 -> V4a:
* Convert helper functions to return error codes (Dave)
* Consolidate loop-control logic
* Refactor next-chunk calculation/check for clarity
* Remove offset sanity check (moved to next patch)
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 133 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 3ca22457d839..a1b13202330d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/uio.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -33,6 +35,16 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
#define UCODE_BSP_LOADED ((struct microcode_intel *)0x1UL)
+/* Defines for the microcode staging mailbox interface */
+
+#define MBOX_REG_NUM 4
+#define MBOX_REG_SIZE sizeof(u32)
+
+#define MBOX_CONTROL_OFFSET 0x0
+#define MBOX_STATUS_OFFSET 0x4
+
+#define MASK_MBOX_CTRL_ABORT BIT(0)
+
/* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_va __read_mostly;
static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_late __read_mostly;
@@ -319,13 +331,130 @@ static __init struct microcode_intel *scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
}
/*
- * Handle the staging process using the mailbox MMIO interface.
- * Return the result state.
+ * Prepare for a new microcode transfer: reset hardware and record the
+ * image size.
+ */
+static void init_stage(struct staging_state *ss)
+{
+ ss->ucode_len = get_totalsize(&ucode_patch_late->hdr);
+
+ /*
+ * Abort any ongoing process, effectively resetting the device.
+ * Unlike regular mailbox data processing requests, this
+ * operation does not require a status check.
+ */
+ writel(MASK_MBOX_CTRL_ABORT, ss->mmio_base + MBOX_CONTROL_OFFSET);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return PAGE_SIZE, or remaining bytes if this is the final chunk
+ */
+static inline unsigned int calc_next_chunk_size(unsigned int ucode_len, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ return min(PAGE_SIZE, ucode_len - offset);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Update the chunk size and decide whether another chunk can be sent.
+ * This accounts for remaining data and retry limits.
+ */
+static bool can_send_next_chunk(struct staging_state *ss)
+{
+ ss->chunk_size = calc_next_chunk_size(ss->ucode_len, ss->offset);
+ /*
+ * Each microcode image is divided into chunks, each at most
+ * one page size. A 10-chunk image would typically require 10
+ * transactions.
+ *
+ * However, the hardware managing the mailbox has limited
+ * resources and may not cache the entire image, potentially
+ * requesting the same chunk multiple times.
+ *
+ * To tolerate this behavior, allow up to twice the expected
+ * number of transactions (i.e., a 10-chunk image can take up to
+ * 20 attempts).
+ *
+ * If the number of attempts exceeds this limit, the hardware is
+ * likely stuck and mark the state as timeout.
+ */
+ if (ss->bytes_sent + ss->chunk_size > ss->ucode_len * 2) {
+ ss->state = UCODE_TIMEOUT;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Determine whether staging is complete: either the hardware signaled
+ * the end offset, or no more transactions are permitted (retry limit
+ * reached).
+ */
+static inline bool staging_is_complete(struct staging_state *ss)
+{
+ return (ss->offset == UINT_MAX) || !can_send_next_chunk(ss);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Transmit a chunk of the microcode image to the hardware.
+ * Return 0 on success, or an error code on failure.
+ */
+static int send_data_chunk(struct staging_state *ss, void *ucode_ptr __maybe_unused)
+{
+ pr_debug_once("Staging mailbox loading code needs to be implemented.\n");
+ ss->state = UCODE_ERROR;
+ return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Retrieve the next offset from the hardware response.
+ * Return 0 on success, or an error code on failure.
+ */
+static int fetch_next_offset(struct staging_state *ss)
+{
+ pr_debug_once("Staging mailbox response handling code needs to be implemented.\n\n");
+ ss->state = UCODE_ERROR;
+ return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the staging process using the mailbox MMIO interface. The
+ * microcode image is transferred in chunks until completion. Return the
+ * result state.
*/
static enum ucode_state do_stage(u64 mmio_pa)
{
- pr_debug_once("Staging implementation is pending.\n");
- return UCODE_ERROR;
+ struct staging_state ss = {};
+ int err;
+
+ ss.mmio_base = ioremap(mmio_pa, MBOX_REG_NUM * MBOX_REG_SIZE);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ss.mmio_base))
+ return UCODE_ERROR;
+
+ init_stage(&ss);
+
+ /* Perform the staging process while within the retry limit */
+ while (!staging_is_complete(&ss)) {
+ /* Send a chunk of microcode each time: */
+ err = send_data_chunk(&ss, ucode_patch_late);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ /*
+ * Then, ask the hardware which piece of the image it
+ * needs next. The same piece may be sent more than once.
+ */
+ err = fetch_next_offset(&ss);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ iounmap(ss.mmio_base);
+
+ /*
+ * The helpers update ss.state on error. The final state is
+ * returned to the caller.
+ */
+ return ss.state;
}
static void stage_microcode(void)
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 23:40 [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Support for Intel Microcode Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2025-03-20 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/microcode: Introduce staging step to reduce late-loading time Chang S. Bae
2025-03-20 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/microcode/intel: Define staging state struct Chang S. Bae
2025-03-20 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic Chang S. Bae
2025-03-21 21:18 ` [PATCH v2a " Chang S. Bae
2025-03-26 7:35 ` Chao Gao
2025-03-26 18:43 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-03-27 1:44 ` Chao Gao
2025-03-28 14:12 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-03-20 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/microcode/intel: Implement staging handler Chang S. Bae
2025-03-21 0:15 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-21 21:19 ` [PATCH v2a " Chang S. Bae
2025-03-26 8:34 ` Chao Gao
2025-03-26 18:43 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-03-21 21:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Chang S. Bae
2025-03-20 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] x86/microcode/intel: Support mailbox transfer Chang S. Bae
2025-03-21 21:19 ` [PATCH v2a " Chang S. Bae
2025-03-27 3:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Chao Gao
2025-03-27 14:11 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-03-31 19:16 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-20 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] x86: Support for Intel Microcode Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/microcode: Introduce staging step to reduce late-loading time Chang S. Bae
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic Chang S. Bae
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/microcode/intel: Define staging state struct Chang S. Bae
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/microcode/intel: Implement staging handler Chang S. Bae
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/microcode/intel: Support mailbox transfer Chang S. Bae
2025-04-16 14:14 ` Chao Gao
2025-04-16 17:22 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-16 17:37 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-09 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] x86: Support for Intel Microcode Staging Feature Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/microcode: Introduce staging step to reduce late-loading time Chang S. Bae
2025-08-18 7:45 ` Chao Gao
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 18:21 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-13 20:46 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 20:55 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-14 18:30 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-22 22:39 ` [PATCH] x86/cpu/topology: Make primary thread mask available with SMP=n Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 16:05 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-22 22:39 ` [PATCH v4a 2/6] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic Chang S. Bae
2025-08-22 23:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86/microcode/intel: Define staging state struct Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 18:25 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-22 22:39 ` [PATCH v4a " Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/microcode/intel: Implement staging handler Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 18:44 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-22 22:39 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/microcode/intel: Support mailbox transfer Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 19:07 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-22 22:40 ` [PATCH v4a " Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2025-08-18 8:35 ` Chao Gao
2025-08-22 22:42 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-13 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] x86: Support for Intel Microcode Staging Feature Dave Hansen
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] x86/cpu/topology: Make primary thread mask available with SMP=n Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] x86/microcode: Introduce staging step to reduce late-loading time Chang S. Bae
2025-09-04 12:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-05 0:06 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] x86/microcode/intel: Establish staging control logic Chang S. Bae
2025-09-04 12:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-05 0:04 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-09-05 11:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-05 16:31 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] x86/microcode/intel: Define staging state struct Chang S. Bae
2025-09-04 13:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-05 0:05 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] x86/microcode/intel: Implement staging handler Chang S. Bae
2025-09-10 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-10 21:31 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/microcode/intel: Support mailbox transfer Chang S. Bae
2025-09-12 16:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-13 0:51 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-09-13 19:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] x86/microcode/intel: Enable staging when available Chang S. Bae
2025-08-26 22:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] x86: Support for Intel Microcode Staging Feature Luck, Tony
2025-08-26 22:15 ` Chang S. Bae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250822223956.12540-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=abusse@amazon.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=colinmitchell@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®