From: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 21:29:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250823155947.1354229-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
This series adds ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension implemented
by KVM RISC-V. This was missed out in accepted SBI FWFT patches for
KVM RISC-V.
These patches can also be found in the riscv_kvm_fwft_one_reg_v3 branch
at: https://github.com/avpatel/linux.git
Changes since v2:
- Re-based on latest KVM RISC-V queue
- Improved FWFT ONE_REG interface to allow enabling/disabling each
FWFT feature from KVM userspace
Changes since v1:
- Dropped have_state in PATCH4 as suggested by Drew
- Added Drew's Reviewed-by in appropriate patches
Anup Patel (6):
RISC-V: KVM: Set initial value of hedeleg in kvm_arch_vcpu_create()
RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT
RISC-V: KVM: Introduce optional ONE_REG callbacks for SBI extensions
RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation
RISC-V: KVM: Implement ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT state
KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test
arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 22 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi_fwft.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 15 ++
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 3 +-
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 60 +----
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 172 +++++++++++--
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++--
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_sta.c | 63 +++--
.../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 32 +++
9 files changed, 467 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-23 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-23 15:59 Anup Patel [this message]
2025-08-23 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] RISC-V: KVM: Set initial value of hedeleg in kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Anup Patel
2025-08-23 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT Anup Patel
2025-08-23 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce optional ONE_REG callbacks for SBI extensions Anup Patel
2025-08-23 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation Anup Patel
2025-08-23 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] RISC-V: KVM: Implement ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT state Anup Patel
2025-09-05 14:21 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-23 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test Anup Patel
2025-08-25 11:02 ` Andrew Jones
2025-09-08 3:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250823155947.1354229-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--to=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®