mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
	Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Yazen Ghannam" <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/20] x86/mce: Reorder __mcheck_cpu_init_generic() call
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:33:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250825-wip-mca-updates-v5-7-865768a2eef8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825-wip-mca-updates-v5-0-865768a2eef8@amd.com>

Move __mcheck_cpu_init_generic() after __mcheck_cpu_init_prepare_banks()
so that MCA is enabled after the first MCA polling event.

This brings the MCA init flow closer to what is described in the x86 docs.

The AMD PPRs say
  "The operating system must initialize the MCA_CONFIG registers prior
  to initialization of the MCA_CTL registers.

  The MCA_CTL registers must be initialized prior to enabling the error
  reporting banks in MCG_CTL".

However, the Intel SDM "Machine-Check Initialization Pseudocode" says
MCG_CTL first then MCi_CTL.

But both agree that CR4.MCE should be set last.

Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
---

Notes:
    Link:
    https://lore.kernel.org/r/52a37afe-c41b-4f20-bbdc-bddc3ae26260@suse.com
    
    v4->v5:
    * New in v5.

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
index 0326fbb83adc..9cbf9e8c8060 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
@@ -2272,9 +2272,9 @@ void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
 	mca_cfg.initialized = 1;
 
-	__mcheck_cpu_init_generic();
 	__mcheck_cpu_init_vendor(c);
 	__mcheck_cpu_init_prepare_banks();
+	__mcheck_cpu_init_generic();
 	__mcheck_cpu_setup_timer();
 }
 
@@ -2440,9 +2440,9 @@ static void mce_syscore_shutdown(void)
  */
 static void mce_syscore_resume(void)
 {
-	__mcheck_cpu_init_generic();
 	__mcheck_cpu_init_vendor(raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_info));
 	__mcheck_cpu_init_prepare_banks();
+	__mcheck_cpu_init_generic();
 }
 
 static struct syscore_ops mce_syscore_ops = {
@@ -2459,8 +2459,8 @@ static void mce_cpu_restart(void *data)
 {
 	if (!mce_available(raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_info)))
 		return;
-	__mcheck_cpu_init_generic();
 	__mcheck_cpu_init_prepare_banks();
+	__mcheck_cpu_init_generic();
 	__mcheck_cpu_init_timer();
 }
 

-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-25 17:32 [PATCH v5 00/20] AMD MCA interrupts rework Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:32 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] x86/mce/amd: Rename threshold restart function Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:32 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] x86/mce/amd: Remove return value for mce_threshold_{create,remove}_device() Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] x86/mce/amd: Remove smca_banks_map Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 18:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-25 19:54     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-05 11:40   ` [tip: ras/core] " tip-bot2 for Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] x86/mce/amd: Put list_head in threshold_bank Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-01 15:41   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-09-01 16:41     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] x86/mce: Cleanup bank processing on init Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-26 12:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-26 13:47     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-26 14:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-05 11:40   ` [tip: ras/core] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] x86/mce: Remove __mcheck_cpu_init_early() Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-05 11:40   ` [tip: ras/core] " tip-bot2 for Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2025-09-01 17:07   ` [PATCH v5 07/20] x86/mce: Reorder __mcheck_cpu_init_generic() call Borislav Petkov
2025-09-02 13:30     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-02 16:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-02 17:14         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] x86/mce: Do 'UNKNOWN' vendor check early Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] x86/mce: Separate global and per-CPU quirks Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] x86/mce: Move machine_check_poll() status checks to helper functions Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] x86/mce: Unify AMD THR handler with MCA Polling Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-02 11:10   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-02 13:37     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-02 17:04       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-02 17:25         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-03  9:48           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR " Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] x86/mce/amd: Enable interrupt vectors once per-CPU on SMCA systems Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-03 10:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-03 14:00     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-03 15:39       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] x86/mce/amd: Support SMCA Corrected Error Interrupt Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] x86/mce/amd: Remove redundant reset_block() Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] x86/mce/amd: Define threshold restart function for banks Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms Yazen Ghannam
2025-08-25 17:33 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] x86/mce: Save and use APEI corrected threshold limit Yazen Ghannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250825-wip-mca-updates-v5-7-865768a2eef8@amd.com \
    --to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®