mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched/fair: Use sched_domain_span() for topology_span_sane()
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:16:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250825111627.GW3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5940cd15-b207-416a-b4e4-b5953f4cbf47@amd.com>

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:17:52PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:

> The above helpers may need guarding behind CONFIG_SCHED_{SMT,CLUSTER,MC}
> if I'm not mistaken. Possibility for some unification and cleanup with:
> 

> Thoughts?

I hate we need __maybe_unused on static inline functions, but yeah, that
might be nicer.

Can you fold the lot and stick that nice Changelog on? Then I'll get it
into sched/core and we can forget all about this stuff.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-15  4:08 K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-25  9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-25 10:47   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-25 11:16     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-08-25 12:16       ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250825111627.GW3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®