From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ACA30DEB4 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 21:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756331230; cv=none; b=eGfO0ibbBWgrsnVz+d2FymISp24leVHG2YQ8U9BnTYbY7nITZNATmz6hwVclsBq1TW4/hlBU3Gwxd0cwZSLBdzq0T9rTctckaWhoB8Aq0yD8uDHD1CmKXNHvh0ugiZNTNyPRTVh9wuMejnBojvI45CxQYAQfNx1ThK87dd1byBs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756331230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9RW8zXdpdVYAVUqtLZZ63zwdMXfvo4c5jZhmHZV/++Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=d2S48rL/9RLwdjI+SP+MoUN3WbBdE30QuF/poVN3HwNy64hmo1gW8iiQmYXkGms92Cs/VdbwfSGSbsgtRg9EG9hDsXThoXSbSWxVz3oJChyTtMbvM1DqOMvW9O6gpnajNurIS0zkSQv+P4fO3k4jH4SUrljbMMbCiens/OzOrZI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=BP2txcJj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="BP2txcJj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756331229; x=1787867229; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9RW8zXdpdVYAVUqtLZZ63zwdMXfvo4c5jZhmHZV/++Q=; b=BP2txcJjZMHp2cr+g6iHM0Xw3Mouy/S0/eIiYnfcB6Besp0GK/mcmasx 7VBbzYH4h1fCiEskFesNTo54kHFZUMHTiCPvKrfygDBFUmnYiZdaMwlD7 aekhi7as5wBD94jHFp5lWRtOOwOKcksvfJjntCFKXUTPVnr5a/ac7t9sO j4RByLLHggb7D0svN+IeEg9jzSkzuC7H2BRDljPLriF5OlpALHAg5ORz1 Ru/EuYs5f1GbIs8rYCbMlNpiIto2izHhS363wD1KLlh2JvmSi0K6MmPxe kLCFYGW8xhoFyeCk8tT/7mfN7HcJruHqc1nT0J4TXMaIljTrpD79eLPyP A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lyTrm3gJSWCa94BZCCiglQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4RPmvp1VSyu6nQ8UdFtNJQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11535"; a="76192225" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,217,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="76192225" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2025 14:47:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OzumYTkkRFipllJ6o2zpgg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ILq6xhTLS6uAnu5M0StACA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,217,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="170764828" Received: from ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com ([172.25.110.23]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2025 14:47:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:53:18 -0700 From: Ricardo Neri To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/debugfs: Fix a typo in IRQ effective affinity Message-ID: <20250827215318.GA28201@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com> References: <20250812-rneri-irq-debugfs-typo-v1-1-f29777b4024d@linux.intel.com> <87ikievsh3.ffs@tglx> <20250825231054.GA25222@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250825231054.GA25222@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:10:54PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 07:49:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 12 2025 at 14:00, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > > Fix a typo in the line that prints the effective affinity of the IRQ. > > > > It's not a typo. It's intentionally shortened to make the output > > tabular, which makes it more readable. > > Ah, I didn't see it this way. > > > > > If you want 'effective' then please adjust 'affinity:' with an extra > > space so it stays that way. > > Sure. I can do this. I looked again at my proposed change. I would need to adjust 10 more lines besides 'affinity:' to keep the alignment. Adjusting a couple of lines would not pollute history much. Adjusting multiple lines would do more harm than good, IMO. Unless you think otherwise, I do not plan to pursue this change further. BR, Ricardo