mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] pppoe: remove rwlock usage
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 09:20:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250828012018.15922-1-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)

Like ppp_generic.c, convert the PPPoE socket hash table to use RCU for
lookups and a spinlock for updates. This removes rwlock usage and allows
lockless readers on the fast path.

- Mark hash table and list pointers as __rcu.
- Use spin_lock() to protect writers.
- Readers use rcu_dereference() under rcu_read_lock(). All known callers
  of get_item() already hold the RCU read lock, so no additional locking
  is needed.
- get_item() now uses refcount_inc_not_zero() instead of sock_hold() to
  safely take a reference. This prevents crashes if a socket is already
  in the process of being freed (sk_refcnt == 0).
- Set SOCK_RCU_FREE to defer socket freeing until after an RCU grace
  period.
- Move skb_queue_purge() into sk_destruct callback to ensure purge
  happens after an RCU grace period.

Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
---
v3:
 Move skb_queue_purge() into sk_destruct callback.
 Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250827023045.25002-1-dqfext@gmail.com/
v2:
 Use refcount_inc_not_zero() in get_item() to avoid taking a reference of
 a zero refcount socket.
 Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250826023346.26046-1-dqfext@gmail.com/

 drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c  | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 include/linux/if_pppox.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
index 410effa42ade..54522b26b728 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ struct pppoe_net {
 	 * as well, moreover in case of SMP less locking
 	 * controversy here
 	 */
-	struct pppox_sock *hash_table[PPPOE_HASH_SIZE];
-	rwlock_t hash_lock;
+	struct pppox_sock __rcu *hash_table[PPPOE_HASH_SIZE];
+	spinlock_t hash_lock;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -162,13 +162,13 @@ static struct pppox_sock *__get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
 	int hash = hash_item(sid, addr);
 	struct pppox_sock *ret;
 
-	ret = pn->hash_table[hash];
+	ret = rcu_dereference(pn->hash_table[hash]);
 	while (ret) {
 		if (cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) &&
 		    ret->pppoe_ifindex == ifindex)
 			return ret;
 
-		ret = ret->next;
+		ret = rcu_dereference(ret->next);
 	}
 
 	return NULL;
@@ -177,19 +177,20 @@ static struct pppox_sock *__get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
 static int __set_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, struct pppox_sock *po)
 {
 	int hash = hash_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote);
-	struct pppox_sock *ret;
+	struct pppox_sock *ret, *first;
 
-	ret = pn->hash_table[hash];
+	first = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[hash], lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
+	ret = first;
 	while (ret) {
 		if (cmp_2_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, &po->pppoe_pa) &&
 		    ret->pppoe_ifindex == po->pppoe_ifindex)
 			return -EALREADY;
 
-		ret = ret->next;
+		ret = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next, lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 	}
 
-	po->next = pn->hash_table[hash];
-	pn->hash_table[hash] = po;
+	RCU_INIT_POINTER(po->next, first);
+	rcu_assign_pointer(pn->hash_table[hash], po);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -198,20 +199,24 @@ static void __delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
 					char *addr, int ifindex)
 {
 	int hash = hash_item(sid, addr);
-	struct pppox_sock *ret, **src;
+	struct pppox_sock *ret, __rcu **src;
 
-	ret = pn->hash_table[hash];
+	ret = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[hash], lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 	src = &pn->hash_table[hash];
 
 	while (ret) {
 		if (cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) &&
 		    ret->pppoe_ifindex == ifindex) {
-			*src = ret->next;
+			struct pppox_sock *next;
+
+			next = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next,
+							 lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
+			rcu_assign_pointer(*src, next);
 			break;
 		}
 
 		src = &ret->next;
-		ret = ret->next;
+		ret = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next, lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -225,11 +230,9 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
 {
 	struct pppox_sock *po;
 
-	read_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
 	po = __get_item(pn, sid, addr, ifindex);
-	if (po)
-		sock_hold(sk_pppox(po));
-	read_unlock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	if (po && !refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk_pppox(po)->sk_refcnt))
+		po = NULL;
 
 	return po;
 }
@@ -258,9 +261,9 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *get_item_by_addr(struct net *net,
 static inline void delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
 					char *addr, int ifindex)
 {
-	write_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
 	__delete_item(pn, sid, addr, ifindex);
-	write_unlock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
 }
 
 /***************************************************************************
@@ -276,14 +279,16 @@ static void pppoe_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
 	int i;
 
 	pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev));
-	write_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < PPPOE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
-		struct pppox_sock *po = pn->hash_table[i];
+		struct pppox_sock *po = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[i],
+								  lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 		struct sock *sk;
 
 		while (po) {
 			while (po && po->pppoe_dev != dev) {
-				po = po->next;
+				po = rcu_dereference_protected(po->next,
+							       lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 			}
 
 			if (!po)
@@ -300,7 +305,7 @@ static void pppoe_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
 			 */
 
 			sock_hold(sk);
-			write_unlock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
 			lock_sock(sk);
 
 			if (po->pppoe_dev == dev &&
@@ -320,11 +325,12 @@ static void pppoe_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
 			 */
 
 			BUG_ON(pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev)) == NULL);
-			write_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
-			po = pn->hash_table[i];
+			spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
+			po = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[i],
+						       lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
 		}
 	}
-	write_unlock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
 }
 
 static int pppoe_device_event(struct notifier_block *this,
@@ -528,6 +534,11 @@ static struct proto pppoe_sk_proto __read_mostly = {
 	.obj_size = sizeof(struct pppox_sock),
 };
 
+static void pppoe_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+}
+
 /***********************************************************************
  *
  * Initialize a new struct sock.
@@ -542,11 +553,13 @@ static int pppoe_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int kern)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	sock_init_data(sock, sk);
+	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
 
 	sock->state	= SS_UNCONNECTED;
 	sock->ops	= &pppoe_ops;
 
 	sk->sk_backlog_rcv	= pppoe_rcv_core;
+	sk->sk_destruct		= pppoe_destruct;
 	sk->sk_state		= PPPOX_NONE;
 	sk->sk_type		= SOCK_STREAM;
 	sk->sk_family		= PF_PPPOX;
@@ -599,7 +612,6 @@ static int pppoe_release(struct socket *sock)
 	sock_orphan(sk);
 	sock->sk = NULL;
 
-	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 	release_sock(sk);
 	sock_put(sk);
 
@@ -681,9 +693,9 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uservaddr,
 		       &sp->sa_addr.pppoe,
 		       sizeof(struct pppoe_addr));
 
-		write_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+		spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
 		error = __set_item(pn, po);
-		write_unlock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
 		if (error < 0)
 			goto err_put;
 
@@ -1052,11 +1064,11 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *pppoe_get_idx(struct pppoe_net *pn, loff_t pos)
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PPPOE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
-		po = pn->hash_table[i];
+		po = rcu_dereference(pn->hash_table[i]);
 		while (po) {
 			if (!pos--)
 				goto out;
-			po = po->next;
+			po = rcu_dereference(po->next);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1065,19 +1077,19 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *pppoe_get_idx(struct pppoe_net *pn, loff_t pos)
 }
 
 static void *pppoe_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
-	__acquires(pn->hash_lock)
+	__acquires(RCU)
 {
 	struct pppoe_net *pn = pppoe_pernet(seq_file_net(seq));
 	loff_t l = *pos;
 
-	read_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	return l ? pppoe_get_idx(pn, --l) : SEQ_START_TOKEN;
 }
 
 static void *pppoe_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
 	struct pppoe_net *pn = pppoe_pernet(seq_file_net(seq));
-	struct pppox_sock *po;
+	struct pppox_sock *po, *next;
 
 	++*pos;
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
@@ -1085,14 +1097,15 @@ static void *pppoe_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 		goto out;
 	}
 	po = v;
-	if (po->next)
-		po = po->next;
+	next = rcu_dereference(po->next);
+	if (next)
+		po = next;
 	else {
 		int hash = hash_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote);
 
 		po = NULL;
 		while (++hash < PPPOE_HASH_SIZE) {
-			po = pn->hash_table[hash];
+			po = rcu_dereference(pn->hash_table[hash]);
 			if (po)
 				break;
 		}
@@ -1103,10 +1116,9 @@ static void *pppoe_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 }
 
 static void pppoe_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
-	__releases(pn->hash_lock)
+	__releases(RCU)
 {
-	struct pppoe_net *pn = pppoe_pernet(seq_file_net(seq));
-	read_unlock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static const struct seq_operations pppoe_seq_ops = {
@@ -1149,7 +1161,7 @@ static __net_init int pppoe_init_net(struct net *net)
 	struct pppoe_net *pn = pppoe_pernet(net);
 	struct proc_dir_entry *pde;
 
-	rwlock_init(&pn->hash_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&pn->hash_lock);
 
 	pde = proc_create_net("pppoe", 0444, net->proc_net,
 			&pppoe_seq_ops, sizeof(struct seq_net_private));
diff --git a/include/linux/if_pppox.h b/include/linux/if_pppox.h
index ff3beda1312c..db45d6f1c4f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_pppox.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_pppox.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct pppox_sock {
 	/* struct sock must be the first member of pppox_sock */
 	struct sock sk;
 	struct ppp_channel chan;
-	struct pppox_sock	*next;	  /* for hash table */
+	struct pppox_sock __rcu	*next;	  /* for hash table */
 	union {
 		struct pppoe_opt pppoe;
 		struct pptp_opt  pptp;
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-08-28  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-28  1:20 Qingfang Deng [this message]
2025-08-28  1:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] pppoe: drop sock reference counting on fast path Qingfang Deng
2025-08-28  7:09   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-08-28  7:01 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] pppoe: remove rwlock usage Eric Dumazet
2025-08-29 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250828012018.15922-1-dqfext@gmail.com \
    --to=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mostrows@earthlink.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®