From: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>
To: peterz@infradead.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de,
simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, jani.nikula@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] sched: fix some typos in include/linux/preempt.h
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:03:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250828060354.57846-4-menglong.dong@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828060354.57846-1-menglong.dong@linux.dev>
There are some typos in the comments of migrate in
include/linux/preempt.h:
elegible -> eligible
it's -> its
migirate_disable -> migrate_disable
abritrary -> arbitrary
Just fix them.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
include/linux/preempt.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index 92237c319035..102202185d7a 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static inline void preempt_notifier_init(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
/*
* Migrate-Disable and why it is undesired.
*
- * When a preempted task becomes elegible to run under the ideal model (IOW it
+ * When a preempted task becomes eligible to run under the ideal model (IOW it
* becomes one of the M highest priority tasks), it might still have to wait
* for the preemptee's migrate_disable() section to complete. Thereby suffering
* a reduction in bandwidth in the exact duration of the migrate_disable()
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static inline void preempt_notifier_init(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
* - a lower priority tasks; which under preempt_disable() could've instantly
* migrated away when another CPU becomes available, is now constrained
* by the ability to push the higher priority task away, which might itself be
- * in a migrate_disable() section, reducing it's available bandwidth.
+ * in a migrate_disable() section, reducing its available bandwidth.
*
* IOW it trades latency / moves the interference term, but it stays in the
* system, and as long as it remains unbounded, the system is not fully
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static inline void preempt_notifier_init(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
* PREEMPT_RT breaks a number of assumptions traditionally held. By forcing a
* number of primitives into becoming preemptible, they would also allow
* migration. This turns out to break a bunch of per-cpu usage. To this end,
- * all these primitives employ migirate_disable() to restore this implicit
+ * all these primitives employ migrate_disable() to restore this implicit
* assumption.
*
* This is a 'temporary' work-around at best. The correct solution is getting
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static inline void preempt_notifier_init(struct preempt_notifier *notifier,
* per-cpu locking or short preempt-disable regions.
*
* The end goal must be to get rid of migrate_disable(), alternatively we need
- * a schedulability theory that does not depend on abritrary migration.
+ * a schedulability theory that does not depend on arbitrary migration.
*
*
* Notes on the implementation.
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 6:03 [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: make migrate_enable/migrate_disable inline Menglong Dong
2025-08-28 6:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] arch: add the macro COMPILE_OFFSETS to all the asm-offsets.c Menglong Dong
2025-08-28 6:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: make migrate_enable/migrate_disable inline Menglong Dong
2025-09-16 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-16 16:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-17 1:25 ` Menglong Dong
2025-09-17 1:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-17 1:30 ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-28 6:03 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2025-08-28 9:47 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-09-15 1:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Menglong Dong
2025-09-15 16:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250828060354.57846-4-menglong.dong@linux.dev \
--to=menglong.dong@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®