mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
Cc: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zijun Hu <zijun.hu@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: auxiliary bus: Optimize auxiliary_match_id()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:51:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025090209-unlinked-remedial-555e@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f01e5ce0-6e23-4d1e-bd3a-b4e18bb3286b@icloud.com>

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 08:42:24PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> On 2025/9/2 20:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 08:05:32PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> >> From: Zijun Hu <zijun.hu@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >>
> >> Variable @match_size is fixed in auxiliary_match_id().
> >>
> >> Optimize the function by moving the logic calculating the variable
> >> out of the for loop.
> > Optimize it how?  Does this actually result in a difference somehow, if
> > so, what?
> > 
> 
> auxiliary_match_id() repeatedly calculates variable @match_size in the
> for loop. however, the variable is fixed actually. so it is enough to
> calculate the variable once.
> 
> Optimize it by moving the logic calculating the variable out of the for
> loop, and it result in:
> 
> 1) calculate the variable once instead of repeatedly.
> 2) it will return as early as possible if device name is unexpected,
> namely, (@p == NULL).
> 
> so this fix will improve performance.

This isn't a "performant" path at all, is it?

I'm not disagreeing that calculating this all the time is a bad idea,
but please be reasonable.  If it can't be measured, you can't really say
it will "improve performance" :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-02 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 12:05 Zijun Hu
2025-09-02 12:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-02 12:42   ` Zijun Hu
2025-09-02 12:49     ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-02 12:51     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-09-02 13:06       ` Zijun Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025090209-unlinked-remedial-555e@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=zijun.hu@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®